Re: [idvusers] painting map lines on 3D topography

Dave,

 

I got the impression during all my tests that there may be a complication
due to the relative spatial extents of the two objects, the map and the
topo.  Do you or the IDV folks know if there is some limitation/restriction
on the success of this formula, due to spatial relationship?  And could
spatial subsetting (although I did not use it) play a role?

 

Murray

 

From: David P Dempsey [mailto:dempsey@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:15 PM
To: David Ahijevych
Cc: Murray Brown; idvusers
Subject: Re: [idvusers] painting map lines on 3D topography

 

 

On Oct 3, 2014, at 2:01 PM, David Ahijevych <ahijevyc@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:ahijevyc@xxxxxxxx> > wrote:





Hi,I have that problem too -- when I try a local GFS file, it doesn't
appear on the right side of the map/topo selection screen. Even when I
tried a GFS file from the Catalog it didn't show up as an option on the
right side..

 

David and Murray,

 

It seems to work for me (running IDV v.5.0u1 on a Mac, accessing a local GFS
analysis in GRIB2 format):

 

 

- Dave

 

***************************************************************

* Dr. Dave Dempsey, Chair           |       ^    ___    \|/   * 

* Dept. of Earth & Climate Sciences |  )   ^   /||_||\ --0--  *

* San Francisco State University    | )  )    / ||_|| \ /|\   * 

* 1600 Holloway Ave.                |  )  )  /  ||_||  \      *   

* San Francisco, CA   94132         |  )  ) /   ||_||   \  ^  *  

*                                   | )  )  )   ||_||    \    *   

* Phone:  (415) 338-7716            |  )  )  )~~||~||~~~~~\~~ *

* FAX:      (415) 338-7705          | )  )  )  ) ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ *

* Email:   dempsey@xxxxxxxx <mailto:dempsey@xxxxxxxx>          |  )  )   )
) ) ~ ~  ~ ~ *

***************************************************************

 

 

 



  • 2014 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the idvusers archives: