Gilbert,
>Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:45:09 -0500 (CDT)
>From: Gilbert Sebenste <sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Steve Emmerson <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Question/possible bug on LDM 6.011
The above message contained the following:
> Rats. I'm sorry, I forgot. Well, to be honest...there's nothing to see.
> Basically, the LDM logs looked normal through the entire event (they got
> erased last night). No errors, nothing to indicate that things had gone
> wrong, except for the fact that data had stopped coming in.
There should have been entries from exiting, receiving LDM sub-processes
on why they exited. Such entries might have been useful.
If you're keeping only one days worth of log files, then I suggest that
you increase that number. With all our testing, we keep 14 log files
around. I believe the default number is 4.
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
