David,
The problem is that I cannot put the files into two differents FEED types.
It is one of the constraints of the problem (Many different clients want
differents products, but each client want them tagged with the same FEED
type).
Regards,
Daniel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Knight [mailto:knight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 November, 2003 17:36
> To: Daniel.Lemay@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
>
>
> I see two options (since you don't want to use two machines).
> If you insert the products into the queue originally, then
> you could insert each set of data as a seperate feedtype. If
> this is an existing feed, that you need to split up, then you
> could put a matching pattern in your pqact.conf and reinsert
> the product into the queue using pqinsert and specifying a
> different feedtype. Then just allow by feedtypes as usual.
> Should work, haven't tried it. David
>
> > It's really that they SHOULDN'T get any data that is not
> intended to
> > them.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Steve Emmerson [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 21 November, 2003 17:07
> > > To: Lemay,Daniel [CMC]
> > > Cc: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
> > >
> > >
> > > Daniel,
> > >
> > > >Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:45:47 -0500
> > > >From: "Lemay,Daniel [CMC]" <Daniel.Lemay@xxxxxxxx>
> > > >To: "'Steve Emmerson'" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Subject: RE: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
> > >
> > > The above message contained the following:
> > >
> > > > Suppose that I'm in the following situation:
> > > ...
> > > > -I want to be sure that my "clients" can only obtain the files
> > > > that
> > > > are intend for them. I don't want to rely on the fact they
> > > will choose
> > > > themselves the subset of the feed I allow them. I know that
> > > I cannot
> > > > insert a regular expression in my ALLOW statement to
> restrict what
> > > > files they will have access.
> > >
> > > That's an interesting situation (and one that I haven't
> considered).
> > >
> > > Is it the case that each downstream site SHOULDN'T get the
> > > other's data or that such feed-requests would merely be
> inefficient?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steve Emmerson
> > >
>
