>From: HANKIN@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1992 17:13:13 -0800
>Subject: RE: netCDF conventions
>Hi Rich,
>
>If you get a concise answer to this please pass it along. We have written sty
> le
>guides for our own interpretation of "nice" based on the netCDF Users' Guide.
>
> steve
>
>===================================
>
>
>Part of the driving force behind netCDF is the possibility of writing
>applications that access generic netCDF files and operate on them to do
>whatever they will. Graphics applications seem like an obvious
>possibility. However, it is likely that novices (like myself) will leave out
>"necessary" attributes or other information that effectively limit that use
>of generic applications. Have there been writings or discussions concerning
>what a "well-behaved" netCDF files look like? If so, I'd like to hear about
>it!
>
>
------- End of Forwarded Message
