>There is some confusion about the level of support for Windows ports of
>netCDF, because in the netCDF FAQ at
>
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/netcdf/faq.html#platforms
>
>we include Windows NT-3.51 among the list of platforms on which netCDF
>has been built and tested. Linux is another example of a platform that
>we don't directly support, but for which users have reported success in
>building and testing the current release.
>
>To clarify things, I will separate the on-line list of platforms in the
>FAQ document into two parts:
>
> 1. platforms we directly support, and
>
> 2. platforms on which the software has been built and successfully
> tested by someone else.
>
>We'll try to continue to incorporate changes needed to make netCDF work
>on platforms to which we have no access, but we may not be able to
>retest a minor release on all such platforms.
Hi,
I have just installed the netCDF library 3.1a on a Linux PC (version 2.0)
and on a Alpha (OSF1 V3.2, ALSO NOT IN THE LIST OF SUPPORTED PLATFORMS).
And it works just fine. I played arround with the new functions, and I
think that they are a big improvement (THANKS). I haven't tested if it is
faster.
On the Dec Alpha I had to use gcc (version 2.7.2.1), because the cc
compiler complained about a floating-point domain error...
Best regards,
Richard
PS. are there any plans to support building a (optional) shared
netCDF-library? With gcc it is straight forward (atleast on a Linux, IRIX
-----
/==================================================================\
| Richard M. van Hees | email : R.M.vanHees@xxxxxxxxxx |
| p/a IMAU | phone : +31 (0)30 2532978 |
| Princetonplein 5 | fax : +31 (0)30 2543163 |
| NL-3584 CC Utrecht | room : 669 |
| The Netherlands | |
\==================================================================/
