Thank you. I will follow that advice.
Cheers.
--------------
John Helly, UCSD / San Diego Supercomputer Center / Scripps Institution of
Oceanography, Climate, Atmospheric Science, and Physical Oceanography / +01 760
840 8660 mobile / stonesteps (Skype) / stonesteps7 (iChat) /
/www.sdsc.edu/~hellyj
On Oct 19, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Ed Hartnett wrote:
Larry Baker <baker@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> The reason I put the -m64 in the CC, CXX, and FC variables is so that
> -
> m64 is supplied to any LD step. That way the 64-bit libraries are
> used at link time. This is necessary on some of the platforms I've
> used. I think of -m64 as fundamentally selecting a different
> compiler; it's not really the same as other compile-time flags.
>
> Larry Baker
> US Geological Survey
> 650-329-5608
> baker@xxxxxxxx
>
Correct! I should also have added:
LDFLAGS=-m64
If you look at the netCDF build page, you will see a bunch of platforms,
and the environment variables used to build there:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/builds/4_1_1/index.jsp
(You must log in to Unidata's web site to see this page.)
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
netcdfgroup mailing list
netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
