I ran out of ideas.
It appears the netCDF libraries installed by the sysadmins were configured
with parallel I/O support and thus the mod file should contains constant
nf90_netcdf4 and others. (The compile command line looks fine with me.)
One suggestion is to build netCDF/HDF5 under your home folder. During
the build process, it might reveal the causes (you can run your own "make
check").
Wei-keng
On May 7, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> From wkliao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri May 5 23:17:20 2017
>>
>> The following command can tell whether netcdf is built with parallel I/O
>> support.
>>
>> % nm libnetcdf.a | grep nc_use_parallel_enabled
>> 0000000000002200 T nc_use_parallel_enabled
>
> yes, this is fine:
>
> $ nm /cm/shared/libraries/intel_build/netcdf-4-par/lib/libnetcdf.a| grep
> nc_use_parallel_enabled
> 0000000000005670 T nc_use_parallel_enabled
>
> However, we are talking about the module file,
> not the library file. My errors are on compilation,
> because I have "implicit none":
>
> cgca_m2netcdf.f90(157): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must
> have an explicit type. [NF90_NETCDF4]
> call check( nf90_create(fname, ior(nf90_netcdf4,nf90_mpiio), ncid, &
> -----------------------------------^
>
> The definition for this var should be in the module file:
>
> /cm/shared/libraries/intel_build/netcdf-4-par/include/netcdf.mod
>
> but apparently is missing.
>
> Anton
