[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDRADR idea



Pete,

I can add the flag to ignore clear air mode.

Some other ideas are to use the ruc grids to mask the radar
grid based on boundary layer relative humidity, precip type etc.

I'm always reluctant to throw away "data", and many sites
in clear air mode do have data....especially in the winter.
But, if I can give tools and let the user throw away their own data
then thats more power for the end product.

Glad to hear that the program is useful. I really haven't gotten much
feedback (except from NWS sites that don't store their radar data in 
the hierarch used by the GUIs which makes things a little more involded to 
configure).


Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Pete Pokrandt wrote:

> 
> Steve,
> 
> I've been using the GDRADR compositing program for some time now
> and it works wonderfully. I've noticed that in the evenings especially,
> and lately with the humid weather we've been having here, there's
> a lot of clutter, the images are mostly filled with 5-10 dbz non-precip
> stuff.
> 
> I'm thinking that if one were able to not include the radars sending in
> clear air mode that most of that would dissapear.
> 
> I was wondering if there would be any way to have the program ignore
> radars in clear air mode, maybe a flag or parameter to choose whether
> or not to include those?
> 
> Just an idea, we love the program!
> 
> Pete
> 
> --
> +>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+
> ^ Pete Pokrandt                    V 1447  AOSS Bldg  1225 W Dayton St^
> ^ Systems Programmer               V Madison,         WI     53706    ^
> ^                                  V      address@hidden       ^
> ^ Dept of Atmos & Oceanic Sciences V (608) 262-3086 (Phone/voicemail) ^
> ^ University of Wisconsin-Madison  V       262-0166 (Fax)             ^
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+
> 
>