[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GEMPAK #JOS-568156]: GEMPAK5.9.4 and 5.10.1

Steve,

This sounds great. 

You can have any number of allow lines in ldmd.conf, so the global ANY line
for unidata.ucar.edu will be fine.

For your IT folks, we have 2 different networks (one jumbo frames) that our
various ldm hosts are on. For testing, if they could open up
access from 128.117.140.* and 128.117.156.*, then we would be able to pull a 
feed for testing,
and have configuration available to relay.

Chiz

-------------------------------
Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support


> Hi Chiz.
> 
> I never received the reply on the Canadian RADAR feed - maybe our Mail
> Server or filters trapped them?
> 
> RADAR PRODUCT TYPES:
> [1] CAPPI 1.5km - this is what we are currently getting
> [2] PRECIP - We are testing this for two sites and will be getting all
> soon
> [3] We are investigating getting IRIS LEVEL II.  The issue is that there
> isn't any stream available, only files are collected and then
> redistributed, so the solution here will be longer term.
> 
> DISTRIBUTION:
> We want to ease into this to monitor resources necessary.  Could we feed
> UNIDATA to start, then you can get the decoders working on a live feed
> while we measure the load on our IT support and bandwidth.
> If we use the gzipped NumericA text product we can start with all we
> have available, i.e. the CAPPI 1.5 and two PRECIP sites.
> 
> I have confirmed permission from my management, but need to talk through
> using the IT OPS LDMs: pelmldmoak.operation.pelmorex.com.  I am sure
> there will be questions to answer - what names, IPS and firewall
> settings.
> 
> If you are OK with this, I will talk with our IT OPS about allowing
> UNIDATA to request from pelmldmoak.operation.pelmorex.com:
> 
> 
> #REQUEST        EXP             ([PRS]).TXT.gz
> pelmldmoak.operation.pelmorex.com
> 
> Is it OK to have two allow statements in ldmd.conf, or do we just add
> UNIDATA to the list?
> 
> # Under no circumstances comment out the next allow entry to localhost
> # The LDM will NOT start if the entry is commented-out.
> ALLOW   ANY
> ^((localhost|loopback)|(127\.0\.0\.1\.?$)|(10\.10\.0\.0\.?$))   .*
> #
> # Give permission to the Unidata Program Center
> ALLOW   ANY     ^[a-z].*\.unidata\.ucar\.edu\.?$        .*
> 
> Stephen Sinnis
> Pelmorex Media Inc
> T. 905.829.1159 x1379
> F. 905.829.5800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Unidata GEMPAK Support
> [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 6:30 PM
> To: Stephen Sinnis
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: [GEMPAK #JOS-568156]: GEMPAK5.9.4 and 5.10.1
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I'll take a look at gdgrib. With respect to the radar data, I replied
> back on Jan 24, 2007:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> > Hi All.
> >
> > Pelmorex is pleased to be able to offer our Canadian RADAR data,
> > purchased from Environment Canada, to UNIDATA for distribution on the
> IDD.
> >
> > Thanks to Steve Chiswell for his assistance in working with the
> > Canadian RADAR in NumericA format in GEMPAK at the 2006 Fall
> > Workshops, Pelmorex could see the benefits of sharing data with the
> UNIDATA community.
> >
> > At the DECEMBER 2006 Technical Cooperation Meeting between Pelmorex
> > and Environment Canada, general approval was given allowing Pelmorex
> > to provide the Canadian RADAR to the UNIDATA users community.
> >
> > Could someone please contact me so the details can be determined, if
> > UNIDATA is interested in this data; and the possibilities of other
> > data that Pelmorex may have that might be of interest.
> >
> > Stephen Sinnis
> > Pelmorex Media Inc
> > T. 905.829.1159 x1379
> > F. 905.829.5800
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I'd be happy to work with you regarding any data sets you may want to
> share.
> For the radar data, we looked at the cappi rainfall rate product for
> generating the composites. Depending on what you feel is the best way to
> distribute this data, I can incorporate the program into the 5.10.1
> GEMPAK release as needed.
> 
> Let me know what you have in mind!
> 
> Steve Chiswell
> Unidata User Support
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> I was unsure if you would want to feed sites directly, or provide to
> Unidata for redistribution. Also, at the time I looked at your data, it
> was a single level CAPPI, are there other level? Also, you mentioned a
> seasonal ZtoR shift, but that the data was provided as rainfall rate
> values. Any other thoughts on your end on distribution?
> I'd be happy to try an LDM feed!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Chiswell
> Unidata User Support
> 
> 
> Ticket Details
> ===================
> Ticket ID: JOS-568156
> Department: Support GEMPAK
> Priority: Normal
> Status: Closed
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Chiz.
> 
> I never received the reply on the Canadian RADAR feed - maybe our Mail
> Server or filters trapped them?
> 
> RADAR PRODUCT TYPES:
> [1] CAPPI 1.5km - this is what we are currently getting
> [2] PRECIP - We are testing this for two sites and will be getting all
> soon
> [3] We are investigating getting IRIS LEVEL II.  The issue is that there
> isn't any stream available, only files are collected and then
> redistributed, so the solution here will be longer term.
> 
> DISTRIBUTION:
> We want to ease into this to monitor resources necessary.  Could we feed
> UNIDATA to start, then you can get the decoders working on a live feed
> while we measure the load on our IT support and bandwidth.
> If we use the gzipped NumericA text product we can start with all we
> have available, i.e. the CAPPI 1.5 and two PRECIP sites.
> 
> I have confirmed permission from my management, but need to talk through
> using the IT OPS LDMs: pelmldmoak.operation.pelmorex.com.  I am sure
> there will be questions to answer - what names, IPS and firewall
> settings.
> 
> If you are OK with this, I will talk with our IT OPS about allowing
> UNIDATA to request from pelmldmoak.operation.pelmorex.com:
> 
> 
> #REQUEST        EXP             ([PRS]).TXT.gz
> pelmldmoak.operation.pelmorex.com
> 
> Is it OK to have two allow statements in ldmd.conf, or do we just add
> UNIDATA to the list?
> 
> # Under no circumstances comment out the next allow entry to localhost
> # The LDM will NOT start if the entry is commented-out.
> ALLOW   ANY
> ^((localhost|loopback)|(127\.0\.0\.1\.?$)|(10\.10\.0\.0\.?$))   .*
> #
> # Give permission to the Unidata Program Center
> ALLOW   ANY     ^[a-z].*\.unidata\.ucar\.edu\.?$        .*
> 
> Stephen Sinnis
> Pelmorex Media Inc
> T. 905.829.1159 x1379
> F. 905.829.5800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Unidata GEMPAK Support
> [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 6:30 PM
> To: Stephen Sinnis
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: [GEMPAK #JOS-568156]: GEMPAK5.9.4 and 5.10.1
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I'll take a look at gdgrib. With respect to the radar data, I replied
> back on Jan 24, 2007:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> > Hi All.
> >
> > Pelmorex is pleased to be able to offer our Canadian RADAR data,
> > purchased from Environment Canada, to UNIDATA for distribution on the
> IDD.
> >
> > Thanks to Steve Chiswell for his assistance in working with the
> > Canadian RADAR in NumericA format in GEMPAK at the 2006 Fall
> > Workshops, Pelmorex could see the benefits of sharing data with the
> UNIDATA community.
> >
> > At the DECEMBER 2006 Technical Cooperation Meeting between Pelmorex
> > and Environment Canada, general approval was given allowing Pelmorex
> > to provide the Canadian RADAR to the UNIDATA users community.
> >
> > Could someone please contact me so the details can be determined, if
> > UNIDATA is interested in this data; and the possibilities of other
> > data that Pelmorex may have that might be of interest.
> >
> > Stephen Sinnis
> > Pelmorex Media Inc
> > T. 905.829.1159 x1379
> > F. 905.829.5800
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I'd be happy to work with you regarding any data sets you may want to
> share.
> For the radar data, we looked at the cappi rainfall rate product for
> generating the composites. Depending on what you feel is the best way to
> distribute this data, I can incorporate the program into the 5.10.1
> GEMPAK release as needed.
> 
> Let me know what you have in mind!
> 
> Steve Chiswell
> Unidata User Support
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> I was unsure if you would want to feed sites directly, or provide to
> Unidata for redistribution. Also, at the time I looked at your data, it
> was a single level CAPPI, are there other level? Also, you mentioned a
> seasonal ZtoR shift, but that the data was provided as rainfall rate
> values. Any other thoughts on your end on distribution?
> I'd be happy to try an LDM feed!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Chiswell
> Unidata User Support
> 
> 
> Ticket Details
> ===================
> Ticket ID: JOS-568156
> Department: Support GEMPAK
> Priority: Normal
> Status: Closed
> 
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: JOS-568156
Department: Support GEMPAK
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed