[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GEMPAK #RJR-299468]: GDPVSF Status

Hi Tim,

Thanks for providing as much detail as you did.  I have run three tests of 
different levels with GDVINT and GDPVSF on the NAM file to confirm that the 
grids look different and I suspect there may be something in the code which 
matches levels in the input to those specified by STARTL and STOPL.  I'll 
update you when I know more.

Michael




> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thank you for update on the GDPVSF tool. I am having some more problems with 
> the GDPVSF tool, and I think there may be a coding issue. The data that I am 
> using are in pressure coordinates, so I have to use GDVINT to interpolate the 
> dataset to theta coordinates. When I make this conversion and run GDPVSF, the 
> output that is plotted tends to have gaps in the dataset. The amount of data 
> that comes through seems to be dependent upon the range of theta values that 
> I interpolate the pressure data to. I have tried to do this with both 
> archived operational NAM data and NARR data that I converted from GRIB files. 
> In this particular example, I downloaded the file 2011081500_nam212.gem from 
> the following link. 
> http://mtarchive.geol.iastate.edu/2011/08/15/gempak/model/ The file was 
> re-saved with the .grd extension. The settings that I am using for GDVINT are 
> as follows:
> 
> GDFILE = 2011081500_nam212.grd
> GDOUTF = dtnam_test.grd
> GDATTIM = f00
> GLEVEL = 280-380-5
> GVCORD = pres/thta
> MAXGRD = 4000
> GAREA = 15;-130;50;-70
> VCOORD  = pres
> 
> Upon interpolating the pressure coordinate data to theta coordinates, I then 
> run GDPVSF with the following settings:
> 
> GDFILE   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GDOUTF   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GFUNC    =  abs(pvor(pres,wnd))
> GDATTIM  =  f00
> GVCORD   =  thta
> STARTL   =  380
> STOPL    =  280
> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> GDOUTL   =  15
> GVOUTC   =  pvab
> GPACK    =
> GLIST    =  thta;pres
> PMAX     =  800
> 
> This process produced a DT surface with holes at higher values of theta (see 
> attached file). I also tried to rerun all of these tools with an increased 
> range of potential temperature (280-420k). The end result yields a DT surface 
> with  most of the values over the CONUS missing. Do you know what is causing 
> this inconsistent output with these dynamic tropopause surfaces?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim Lahmers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Unidata GEMPAK Support wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > I've added the fix for GDPVSf in GEMPAK 6.8.0 which can be downloaded at 
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/gempak/ or from github at 
> > https://github.com/Unidata/gempak/tree/master/gempak/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf
> >
> > if you don't want to reinstall 6.8.0, you can download the contents of that 
> > gdpvsf direvctory and in $GEMPAK/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf/ run "rm 
> > $OS_LIB/gdpvsf.a; make everything"
> >
> > -Michael
> >
> >> Quick update.
> >>
> >> I've got the program working on the hrcbob data set once again.  Yet to 
> >> test it on the nam and your other GD input, but if that seems okay I'll 
> >> send you the update tomorrow.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi Tim,
> >>>
> >>> GDPVSF is a mess right now, yes.  I'm trying to fix it this morning and 
> >>> seeing some problems with how the grid files are opened and read, likely 
> >>> due to not keeping up with changes in the grid diagnostic library.  I'll 
> >>> let you know what I find.
> >>>
> >>> Michael James
> >>> Unidata
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi GEMPAK Support,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am currently working on a project that requires me to use the GDPVSF
> >>>> function in GEMPAK 6.7.0  to compute Dynamic Tropopause surfaces. When I
> >>>> run GDPVSF, there is no output file created; however, the program does
> >>>> not list any errors. I read from the below link from your support site
> >>>> that GDPVSF has not been working properly due to changes from past
> >>>> updates.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/support/help/MailArchives/gempak/msg06131.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know if the problems I am having are related to the same issues
> >>>> described above with GDPVSF? What is the status of the GDPVSF function,
> >>>> and do you know when a working version of it will be available? The
> >>>> input parameters that I am using are listed at the bottom of this
> >>>> message. These parameters originally came from a tutorial concerning the
> >>>> function that I found from a university website (listed below); however,
> >>>> I used a different input file.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.atmos.albany.edu/ftp/gempak/gdpvsf.readme
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Tim Lahmers
> >>>>
> >>>> GDFILE   =  2012081700_nam212.gem
> >>>> GDOUTF   =  DT_test1.grd
> >>>> GFUNC    =  mul(avor(obs),stap)
> >>>> GDATTIM  =  last
> >>>> GVCORD   =  thta
> >>>> STARTL   =  260
> >>>> STOPL    =  350
> >>>> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> >>>> GDOUTL   =  15
> >>>> GVOUTC   =  pvbl
> >>>> GPACK    =
> >>>> GLIST    =  uwnd;vwnd;pres
> >>>> PMAX     =  700
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: RJR-299468
> > Department: Support GEMPAK
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Open
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thank you for update on the GDPVSF tool. I am having some more problems with 
> the GDPVSF tool, and I think there may be a coding issue. The data that I am 
> using are in pressure coordinates, so I have to use GDVINT to interpolate the 
> dataset to theta coordinates. When I make this conversion and run GDPVSF, the 
> output that is plotted tends to have gaps in the dataset. The amount of data 
> that comes through seems to be dependent upon the range of theta values that 
> I interpolate the pressure data to. I have tried to do this with both 
> archived operational NAM data and NARR data that I converted from GRIB files. 
> In this particular example, I downloaded the file 2011081500_nam212.gem from 
> the following link. 
> http://mtarchive.geol.iastate.edu/2011/08/15/gempak/model/ The file was 
> re-saved with the .grd extension. The settings that I am using for GDVINT are 
> as follows:
> 
> GDFILE = 2011081500_nam212.grd
> GDOUTF = dtnam_test.grd
> GDATTIM = f00
> GLEVEL = 280-380-5
> GVCORD = pres/thta
> MAXGRD = 4000
> GAREA = 15;-130;50;-70
> VCOORD  = pres
> 
> Upon interpolating the pressure coordinate data to theta coordinates, I then 
> run GDPVSF with the following settings:
> 
> GDFILE   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GDOUTF   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GFUNC    =  abs(pvor(pres,wnd))
> GDATTIM  =  f00
> GVCORD   =  thta
> STARTL   =  380
> STOPL    =  280
> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> GDOUTL   =  15
> GVOUTC   =  pvab
> GPACK    =
> GLIST    =  thta;pres
> PMAX     =  800
> 
> This process produced a DT surface with holes at higher values of theta (see 
> attached file). I also tried to rerun all of these tools with an increased 
> range of potential temperature (280-420k). The end result yields a DT surface 
> with  most of the values over the CONUS missing. Do you know what is causing 
> this inconsistent output with these dynamic tropopause surfaces?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim Lahmers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Unidata GEMPAK Support wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > I've added the fix for GDPVSf in GEMPAK 6.8.0 which can be downloaded at 
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/gempak/ or from github at 
> > https://github.com/Unidata/gempak/tree/master/gempak/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf
> >
> > if you don't want to reinstall 6.8.0, you can download the contents of that 
> > gdpvsf direvctory and in $GEMPAK/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf/ run "rm 
> > $OS_LIB/gdpvsf.a; make everything"
> >
> > -Michael
> >
> >> Quick update.
> >>
> >> I've got the program working on the hrcbob data set once again.  Yet to 
> >> test it on the nam and your other GD input, but if that seems okay I'll 
> >> send you the update tomorrow.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi Tim,
> >>>
> >>> GDPVSF is a mess right now, yes.  I'm trying to fix it this morning and 
> >>> seeing some problems with how the grid files are opened and read, likely 
> >>> due to not keeping up with changes in the grid diagnostic library.  I'll 
> >>> let you know what I find.
> >>>
> >>> Michael James
> >>> Unidata
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi GEMPAK Support,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am currently working on a project that requires me to use the GDPVSF
> >>>> function in GEMPAK 6.7.0  to compute Dynamic Tropopause surfaces. When I
> >>>> run GDPVSF, there is no output file created; however, the program does
> >>>> not list any errors. I read from the below link from your support site
> >>>> that GDPVSF has not been working properly due to changes from past
> >>>> updates.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/support/help/MailArchives/gempak/msg06131.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know if the problems I am having are related to the same issues
> >>>> described above with GDPVSF? What is the status of the GDPVSF function,
> >>>> and do you know when a working version of it will be available? The
> >>>> input parameters that I am using are listed at the bottom of this
> >>>> message. These parameters originally came from a tutorial concerning the
> >>>> function that I found from a university website (listed below); however,
> >>>> I used a different input file.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.atmos.albany.edu/ftp/gempak/gdpvsf.readme
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Tim Lahmers
> >>>>
> >>>> GDFILE   =  2012081700_nam212.gem
> >>>> GDOUTF   =  DT_test1.grd
> >>>> GFUNC    =  mul(avor(obs),stap)
> >>>> GDATTIM  =  last
> >>>> GVCORD   =  thta
> >>>> STARTL   =  260
> >>>> STOPL    =  350
> >>>> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> >>>> GDOUTL   =  15
> >>>> GVOUTC   =  pvbl
> >>>> GPACK    =
> >>>> GLIST    =  uwnd;vwnd;pres
> >>>> PMAX     =  700
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: RJR-299468
> > Department: Support GEMPAK
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Open
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thank you for update on the GDPVSF tool. I am having some more problems with 
> the GDPVSF tool, and I think there may be a coding issue. The data that I am 
> using are in pressure coordinates, so I have to use GDVINT to interpolate the 
> dataset to theta coordinates. When I make this conversion and run GDPVSF, the 
> output that is plotted tends to have gaps in the dataset. The amount of data 
> that comes through seems to be dependent upon the range of theta values that 
> I interpolate the pressure data to. I have tried to do this with both 
> archived operational NAM data and NARR data that I converted from GRIB files. 
> In this particular example, I downloaded the file 2011081500_nam212.gem from 
> the following link. 
> http://mtarchive.geol.iastate.edu/2011/08/15/gempak/model/ The file was 
> re-saved with the .grd extension. The settings that I am using for GDVINT are 
> as follows:
> 
> GDFILE = 2011081500_nam212.grd
> GDOUTF = dtnam_test.grd
> GDATTIM = f00
> GLEVEL = 280-380-5
> GVCORD = pres/thta
> MAXGRD = 4000
> GAREA = 15;-130;50;-70
> VCOORD  = pres
> 
> Upon interpolating the pressure coordinate data to theta coordinates, I then 
> run GDPVSF with the following settings:
> 
> GDFILE   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GDOUTF   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GFUNC    =  abs(pvor(pres,wnd))
> GDATTIM  =  f00
> GVCORD   =  thta
> STARTL   =  380
> STOPL    =  280
> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> GDOUTL   =  15
> GVOUTC   =  pvab
> GPACK    =
> GLIST    =  thta;pres
> PMAX     =  800
> 
> This process produced a DT surface with holes at higher values of theta (see 
> attached file). I also tried to rerun all of these tools with an increased 
> range of potential temperature (280-420k). The end result yields a DT surface 
> with  most of the values over the CONUS missing. Do you know what is causing 
> this inconsistent output with these dynamic tropopause surfaces?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim Lahmers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Unidata GEMPAK Support wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > I've added the fix for GDPVSf in GEMPAK 6.8.0 which can be downloaded at 
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/gempak/ or from github at 
> > https://github.com/Unidata/gempak/tree/master/gempak/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf
> >
> > if you don't want to reinstall 6.8.0, you can download the contents of that 
> > gdpvsf direvctory and in $GEMPAK/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf/ run "rm 
> > $OS_LIB/gdpvsf.a; make everything"
> >
> > -Michael
> >
> >> Quick update.
> >>
> >> I've got the program working on the hrcbob data set once again.  Yet to 
> >> test it on the nam and your other GD input, but if that seems okay I'll 
> >> send you the update tomorrow.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi Tim,
> >>>
> >>> GDPVSF is a mess right now, yes.  I'm trying to fix it this morning and 
> >>> seeing some problems with how the grid files are opened and read, likely 
> >>> due to not keeping up with changes in the grid diagnostic library.  I'll 
> >>> let you know what I find.
> >>>
> >>> Michael James
> >>> Unidata
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi GEMPAK Support,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am currently working on a project that requires me to use the GDPVSF
> >>>> function in GEMPAK 6.7.0  to compute Dynamic Tropopause surfaces. When I
> >>>> run GDPVSF, there is no output file created; however, the program does
> >>>> not list any errors. I read from the below link from your support site
> >>>> that GDPVSF has not been working properly due to changes from past
> >>>> updates.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/support/help/MailArchives/gempak/msg06131.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know if the problems I am having are related to the same issues
> >>>> described above with GDPVSF? What is the status of the GDPVSF function,
> >>>> and do you know when a working version of it will be available? The
> >>>> input parameters that I am using are listed at the bottom of this
> >>>> message. These parameters originally came from a tutorial concerning the
> >>>> function that I found from a university website (listed below); however,
> >>>> I used a different input file.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.atmos.albany.edu/ftp/gempak/gdpvsf.readme
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Tim Lahmers
> >>>>
> >>>> GDFILE   =  2012081700_nam212.gem
> >>>> GDOUTF   =  DT_test1.grd
> >>>> GFUNC    =  mul(avor(obs),stap)
> >>>> GDATTIM  =  last
> >>>> GVCORD   =  thta
> >>>> STARTL   =  260
> >>>> STOPL    =  350
> >>>> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> >>>> GDOUTL   =  15
> >>>> GVOUTC   =  pvbl
> >>>> GPACK    =
> >>>> GLIST    =  uwnd;vwnd;pres
> >>>> PMAX     =  700
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: RJR-299468
> > Department: Support GEMPAK
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Open
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thank you for update on the GDPVSF tool. I am having some more problems with 
> the GDPVSF tool, and I think there may be a coding issue. The data that I am 
> using are in pressure coordinates, so I have to use GDVINT to interpolate the 
> dataset to theta coordinates. When I make this conversion and run GDPVSF, the 
> output that is plotted tends to have gaps in the dataset. The amount of data 
> that comes through seems to be dependent upon the range of theta values that 
> I interpolate the pressure data to. I have tried to do this with both 
> archived operational NAM data and NARR data that I converted from GRIB files. 
> In this particular example, I downloaded the file 2011081500_nam212.gem from 
> the following link. 
> http://mtarchive.geol.iastate.edu/2011/08/15/gempak/model/ The file was 
> re-saved with the .grd extension. The settings that I am using for GDVINT are 
> as follows:
> 
> GDFILE = 2011081500_nam212.grd
> GDOUTF = dtnam_test.grd
> GDATTIM = f00
> GLEVEL = 280-380-5
> GVCORD = pres/thta
> MAXGRD = 4000
> GAREA = 15;-130;50;-70
> VCOORD  = pres
> 
> Upon interpolating the pressure coordinate data to theta coordinates, I then 
> run GDPVSF with the following settings:
> 
> GDFILE   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GDOUTF   =  dtnam_test.grd
> GFUNC    =  abs(pvor(pres,wnd))
> GDATTIM  =  f00
> GVCORD   =  thta
> STARTL   =  380
> STOPL    =  280
> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> GDOUTL   =  15
> GVOUTC   =  pvab
> GPACK    =
> GLIST    =  thta;pres
> PMAX     =  800
> 
> This process produced a DT surface with holes at higher values of theta (see 
> attached file). I also tried to rerun all of these tools with an increased 
> range of potential temperature (280-420k). The end result yields a DT surface 
> with  most of the values over the CONUS missing. Do you know what is causing 
> this inconsistent output with these dynamic tropopause surfaces?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim Lahmers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Unidata GEMPAK Support wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > I've added the fix for GDPVSf in GEMPAK 6.8.0 which can be downloaded at 
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/gempak/ or from github at 
> > https://github.com/Unidata/gempak/tree/master/gempak/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf
> >
> > if you don't want to reinstall 6.8.0, you can download the contents of that 
> > gdpvsf direvctory and in $GEMPAK/source/programs/gd/gdpvsf/ run "rm 
> > $OS_LIB/gdpvsf.a; make everything"
> >
> > -Michael
> >
> >> Quick update.
> >>
> >> I've got the program working on the hrcbob data set once again.  Yet to 
> >> test it on the nam and your other GD input, but if that seems okay I'll 
> >> send you the update tomorrow.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi Tim,
> >>>
> >>> GDPVSF is a mess right now, yes.  I'm trying to fix it this morning and 
> >>> seeing some problems with how the grid files are opened and read, likely 
> >>> due to not keeping up with changes in the grid diagnostic library.  I'll 
> >>> let you know what I find.
> >>>
> >>> Michael James
> >>> Unidata
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi GEMPAK Support,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am currently working on a project that requires me to use the GDPVSF
> >>>> function in GEMPAK 6.7.0  to compute Dynamic Tropopause surfaces. When I
> >>>> run GDPVSF, there is no output file created; however, the program does
> >>>> not list any errors. I read from the below link from your support site
> >>>> that GDPVSF has not been working properly due to changes from past
> >>>> updates.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/support/help/MailArchives/gempak/msg06131.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know if the problems I am having are related to the same issues
> >>>> described above with GDPVSF? What is the status of the GDPVSF function,
> >>>> and do you know when a working version of it will be available? The
> >>>> input parameters that I am using are listed at the bottom of this
> >>>> message. These parameters originally came from a tutorial concerning the
> >>>> function that I found from a university website (listed below); however,
> >>>> I used a different input file.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.atmos.albany.edu/ftp/gempak/gdpvsf.readme
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Tim Lahmers
> >>>>
> >>>> GDFILE   =  2012081700_nam212.gem
> >>>> GDOUTF   =  DT_test1.grd
> >>>> GFUNC    =  mul(avor(obs),stap)
> >>>> GDATTIM  =  last
> >>>> GVCORD   =  thta
> >>>> STARTL   =  260
> >>>> STOPL    =  350
> >>>> DESIRE   =  0.00000015
> >>>> GDOUTL   =  15
> >>>> GVOUTC   =  pvbl
> >>>> GPACK    =
> >>>> GLIST    =  uwnd;vwnd;pres
> >>>> PMAX     =  700
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: RJR-299468
> > Department: Support GEMPAK
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Open
> >
> 
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: RJR-299468
Department: Support GEMPAK
Priority: Normal
Status: Open