[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 19990208: LDM reclass messages and non-zero status messages



On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Unidata Support wrote:

> 
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> >From: Robert Mullenax <address@hidden>
> >Subject: LDM reclass messages and non-zero status messages
> >Organization: NMSU/NSBF
> >Keywords: 199902081917.MAA18699 LDM RECLASS
> 
> I guess I have been having some network problems between here and NIU
> lately.  I have been getting a lot of RECLASS messages and missing data.
> I read that increased the max latency is possiblilty if you and your
> downstream site have the same value set.  What would the pro's and con's
> of doing that?  The bandwidth bottleneck is not here, it does appear
> to be upstream (from traceroutes).

Robert,

It would be better to find another feeder site. Can you do traceroutes to
the following sites and send the information back to me?  Do it in the
late afternoon when the congestion is high, gives a more accurate reading.

weather.admin.niu.edu
chinook.unl.edu 
stokes.metr.ou.edu
sirocco.srcc.lsu.edu
pluto.met.fsu.edu


Robb...


> Also about once or twice as day I receive a long string (about 50) 
> of pqact[..]  child exited with status 1 messages.  I can't find
> a pattern but mainly seems to occur after I have had disconnects or
> RECLASS messages, but not all of the time.  Any ideas?
> 
> Thanks
> Robert Mullenax
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
> 

===============================================================================
Robb Kambic                                Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III                      Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden             WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================