[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
20010619: NEXRAD server
- Subject: 20010619: NEXRAD server
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:33:21 -0600
>From: Russ Dengel <address@hidden>
>Organization: SSEC
>Keywords: 200106191811.f5JIB0110437 McIDAS-X NEXRAD server
Russ,
> I just found an "interesting" problem in the nexrad server when
>doing a ID=LIST. Operations here at SSEC has set the number of products
>per ID to 250. When we issue the command:
>
> IMGLIST NEXRAD/BREF1 ID=LIST
>
>We usually get a server timeout failure from the NEXRAD server. I assume
>that is because the machine is too slow to wade throught 250 products
>for ~150 stations. The timeout is 2 minutes and on a rare occasion, the
>server does complete before the 2 minutes expires.
This was a common problem before I did one of my rewrites of my server,
but should be fixed now IF one files the data in a logical manner AND
then informs the server of the filing's use of the stations' IDs in
the hierarchy.
I would venture to guess that the problem on your system lies in how
the products are being filed or in how the access to the products has
been defined. I say this because we save a full day's worth of data
for each station for each product on motherlode.ucar.edu This means
that for a full day there can be up to 288 files for each station, and
the time to get a list of stations back from motherlode typically is in
the one to several seconds range.
If one does not setup the filing to be in a logical hierarchy, or if
one doesn't define the dataset access to explicitly tell the server
that the station ID is part of the hierarchy and/or name, then the
server has to open each file to find out what station the file
represents. This would fit your observation that a timeout occurs when
trying to open, read to extract ID information, and then sort 150*250
files.
So, the first place to look is in how the files are being saved. The
second is in how the dataset is defined.
BTW, I _did_ find a bug in the listing of available stations when all
of the files and product types are put into a single directory (i.e.,
no hierarchy). This problem results in a failure to list the available
stations, not in the slowness of listing them. I will be updating the
CVS repository with my fix for this as soon as I get a chance to pretty
up some other code that irks me right at the moment.
Tom
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
* Tom Yoksas UCAR Unidata Program *
* (303) 497-8642 (last resort) P.O. Box 3000 *
* address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307 *
* Unidata WWW Service http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/*
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+