[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should pqsend be included in the ldm distribution?

Glenn,

I use pqsend once in awhile for testing and I know of a couple sites on
the west coast that use it.  I know one could use pqinsert instead but
some of these system have been already created. The change would be small
probably but I don't know the exact installation.  

Robb...



On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Glenn P. Davis wrote:

> As some of you may know, I am attempting to prune deadwood out of
> the ldm distribution. The goal is reduce the number of supported
> programs & options, generally simplifying everyone's lives.
> 
> I'm seeking input as to whether the program 'pqsend' should be
> included in the distribution.
> This program sends data without any solicitation,
> in an ldm4 sort of fashion.
> 
> The program has some utility is for debugging and testing.
> This utility may be duplcated by use of the standard server
> and pqinsert.
> 
> Dropping the program from the distribution does not mean that it
> becomes completely unavailable or unrunnable immediately.
> Existing binaries would work until there was a change to
> the pq implementation. (pq is stable.)
> The source would still be in the UPC archives and buildable
> by without too much trouble. (The amount of trouble could easily
> increase as time goes on.) 
> 
> -glenn
> 

===============================================================================
Robb Kambic                                Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III                      Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden             WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================