*On 05/29/2015 10:35 AM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote:*
Netcdf fortran prefers the f03 module over the f90 module. They
contain the same interface, but f03 does so with iso_c_binding.
As you are required to link against the same compiler (if you use
the module) you should not see any shortcomings of not having f90
modules (everything you need is in the f03 modules). The only
difference is how the module is build and not what interfaces exist.
Please, if the devs note that I am saying something wrong, please
correct :)
Is there a particular reason why you want f90 and not f03?
I'm trying to build the NetCDF and other components (like OpenMPI &
HDF5) with as many of the capabilities enabled as I can.
I think this is the info that I wanted, I'll stick with the F03 unless I
see problems show up.
Thanks,
Carl
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
