[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Feed problems



Christian Page wrote:

> Hi!
>
>   Finally, I was successfull in contacting atmos.uiuc.edu. The problem was 
> that
> they had to use a backup for their config for ldm, and this backup file was 
> when
> I had no feed from them. So, now I can use data2 and squall. I have set up, 
> for
> now, my feed site to be data2, and the backup squall. Though, it is not a 
> great
> idea to have both sites from the same domain. I do that because cirrus is very
> unreliable, because the latency is almost always very high. Can I use 1 feed
> site with 2 backups?
>
> 78 [/io/ldm/etc] % ldmping -i 5 -h data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:18:45      State    Elapsed Port   Remote_Host           rpc_stat
> Feb 15 14:18:46 RESPONDING   0.090236  388   data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:18:51 RESPONDING   0.030207  388   data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:18:56 RESPONDING   0.031943  388   data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:01 RESPONDING   0.036298  388   data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:06 RESPONDING   0.046972  388   data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:11 RESPONDING   0.038213  388   data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:16 RESPONDING   0.031836  388   data2.atmos.uiuc.edu
>
> 79 [/io/ldm/etc] % ldmping -i 5 -h squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:21      State    Elapsed Port   Remote_Host           rpc_stat
> Feb 15 14:19:22 RESPONDING   0.197713  388   squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:27 RESPONDING   0.031161  388   squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:32 RESPONDING   0.031687  388   squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:37 RESPONDING   0.030005  388   squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:42 RESPONDING   0.031707  388   squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:47 RESPONDING   0.030222  388   squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:52 RESPONDING   0.030553  388   squall.atmos.uiuc.edu
>
> 80 [/io/ldm/etc] % ldmping -i 5 -h cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
> Feb 15 14:19:57      State    Elapsed Port   Remote_Host           rpc_stat
> Feb 15 14:19:57 RESPONDING   0.266956  388   cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
> Feb 15 14:20:02 RESPONDING   0.074381  388   cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
> Feb 15 14:20:07 RESPONDING   0.085959  388   cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
> Feb 15 14:20:12 RESPONDING   0.054854  388   cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
> Feb 15 14:20:18 RESPONDING   0.061725  388   cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
> Feb 15 14:20:23 RESPONDING   0.054681  388   cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
> Feb 15 14:20:28 RESPONDING   0.080534  388   cirrus.lsc.vsc.edu
>
>

Hi Christian,  I"m glad things have improved.

We recommend that you not request the same feed from two sites due to the extra 
traffic and LDM overhead that incurs.  If your
connections aren't that good to begin with, the extra traffic won't help.

Robb has suggested you try requesting IDD|DDPLUS from one backup and HDS from 
the other backup.

Anne

--
***************************************************
Anne Wilson                     UCAR Unidata Program
address@hidden                  P.O. Box 3000
(303) 497-8677                    Boulder, CO  80307
----------------------------------------------------
Unidata WWW server       http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
****************************************************