[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20010629: alloc.h

Unidata Support wrote:
> 
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> >To: address@hidden
> >cc: Paul Hamer <address@hidden>
> >From: Paul Hamer <address@hidden>
> >Subject: alloc.h
> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata
> >Keywords: 200106292304.f5TN4M109472
> 
> Hello there,
> 
> A quick question on alloc.h, why is it copied to
> ~ldm/include? The reason I ask is that GCC also
> has a alloc.h for the STL and the ldm alloc.h
> causes problems for some template handling with
> the standard library. It seems that the makefile
> scheme uses -I../misc to find the ldm version of
> the file and it's not included by other header
> file so I'm not sure why it's copied.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul.
> 
> --
> Paul Hamer
> phone: 303.497.6342
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message

Hi Paul,

I'm told by my clever and talented coworker that the traditional form of
a distribution is for the distribution to be "self-contained", i.e., it
needn't go beyond the src directory to find what it needs in order to
build.  Populating the 'include' and 'lib' directories is for 3rd party
software.  This allows you to blow away the src tree if you want and
still write software using the LDM's headers and libraries.  This
explains why *none* of the files in 'include' are referenced in the
Makefiles.  This is news to me.

Hope this helps.

Anne
-- 
***************************************************
Anne Wilson                     UCAR Unidata Program            
address@hidden                 P.O. Box 3000
                                  Boulder, CO  80307
----------------------------------------------------
Unidata WWW server       http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
****************************************************