NOTE: The cf-satellite
mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Hi Martin, On 11/23/11 4:34 AM, Martin Raspaud wrote:
This is a neat idea, that way different conventions for north-to-south (GOES)Geostationary ------------- grid_mapping_name = geos Map parameters: latitude_of_projection_origin longitude_of_projection_origin perspective_point_height scale_x scale_y offset_x offset_y false_easting false_northingActually, we could use add_offset and scale_factor in the x and y variables. x and y would then be integer pixel positions for example, and scale and offset would transform them to viewing angles in radians. The netcdf header would look like this (hand typed): dimensions: y = 328; x = 580; reflective_bands = 5; variables: short reflective_band_data(y, x, reflective_bands) :long_name = "Radiance of reflective bands of the SEVIRI instrument (MSG)"; :units = "milliwatts/m2/steradian/cm-1"; :grid_mapping = "Projection"; :coordinates = "y x"; short x(x); :standard_name = "projection_x_coordinate"; :add_offset = 1856 :scale_factor = -208.16554260253906 :units = "rad" short y(y); :standard_name = "projection_y_coordinate"; :add_offset = 1856 :scale_factor = -208.16554260253906 :units = "rad" char Projection; :grid_mapping_name = "geos"; :perspective_point_height = 35785831.; :semi_major_axis = 6378169.; :semi_minor_axis = 6356583.8; :latitude_of_projection_origin = 0.; :longitude_of_projection_origin = 0.; What do you think ?
south-to-north (SEVIRI) could be handled, ie. if I'm understanding your suggestion? Tom
cf-satellite
archives: