>Greg et al.
>
>While I understand the desire for native model output and I wish we
>could get all of it out to everyone, I don't believe you can initialize
>a WRF run using WPS with it. If there was a complete WRF restart or
>init file's worth of native you could probably bypass WPS (like is done
>in data assimilation cycling), but I don't think that is what Gerry or
>others want to or are capable of doing.
The CAPS ARPS software, http://www.caps.ou.edu/ARPS, can handle the data with
no problems. I've been using this data for over a year, via ftp, for a CAPS
project.
Kevin W. Thomas
Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms
University of Oklahoma
Norman, Oklahoma
Email: kwthomas@xxxxxx
>On 9/11/2012 4:33 PM, Greg Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Agreed here on 13km RAP model - native vertical coordinate with hydrometeors
>> - all things as close to native as possible rather than interpolated either
>> to pressure or eliminating the critical 3D variables.
>>
>> --Greg Thompson, NCAR-RAL
>>
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Gerry Creager wrote:
>>
>>> Becky
>>>
>>> Thanks for getting back to me. We are interested in the 12 km NAM and 13 km
>>> (130 grid) RAP data. If that's possible, it'd be a help. When I first asked
>>> on the LDM list, there was at least one other researcher interested in
>>> higher resolution NAM and RAP. Somehow, I don't think I'd be the only user.
>>>
>>> Appreciate the help, and I fully understand about the delays for new
>>> systems and schedules.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gerry
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Rebecca Cosgrove
>>> <rebecca.cosgrove@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Gerry,
>>> I apologize for my delayed response.
>>> Right now we've got a limit on adding new data to CONDUIT until we upgrade
>>> our system here at NCEP. We're in the process of that upgrade right now.
>>> I'll submit your request for additional NAM 12km fields to the User
>>> Committee meeting on the 17th for consideration after the upgrade. If
>>> others in the group would like to see this data, I encourage you to chime
>>> in and voice your desire for this as well.
>>>
>>> For the RAP, we do have 20km and 40km grids for the CONUS available in
>>> CONDUIT. Is there additional RAP data you are interested in?
>>>
>>> Becky Cosgrove
>>> NCEP Central Operations
>>>
>>>> CONDUIT folk
>>>>
>>>> We're working on a project and I'd configured a CONDUIT feed to acquire
>>>> NAM 218 data. My plan was to kick off processing using a PQACT action when
>>>> the last of the needed data arrived. Problem: We get the surface fields,
>>>> which is not sufficient to initialize WRF. Of course, I can go download
>>>> the data from NCEP (in fact, that's what we're now doing) but I'm
>>>> wondering: Am I the only one looking for these data? Is there sufficient
>>>> bandwidth to allow carrying the full NAM 12 km dataset? What's the chances
>>>> of getting NAM (and, for that matter, RAP) added?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Gerry
>>>> OU/CIMMS/NSSL
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> conduit mailing list
>>>>
>>>> conduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
>>>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> conduit mailing list
>>> conduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
>>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> conduit mailing list
>> conduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>>
>>
>
>--
>Geoff DiMego, Chief Mesoscale Modeling Branch
>Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, NWS/NOAA/DOC
>NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction
>5830 University Research Court (W/NP22) Room 2131
>College Park, MD 20740 Tel/Fax 301-683-3764
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>conduit mailing list
>conduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
>http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
