NOTE: The decoders
mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Mark- Mark J. Laufersweiler wrote:
I am confused now. The new CDL does indeed take care of the pressure tendency variable warning in the IDV, but the IDV is still not displaying all data from my netcdf metar files. Variable such as temps, dewpoints, stid, etc, are not displaying while wind direction, wind speed, station location (den and okc are where you expect to find them on a map). current file: http://weather.ou.edu/~laufers/2005030412_metar.nc I am trying to setup our DODS/ADDE/THREDD server and figured that a good test is to set up the metars. One pqact item only is needed. Get it working, then set up the DODS, get it working and then set up the catalog, get it working. Then set up the ADDE. Nice plan but I am not getting out of the batters box :) I feel that I am missing something here and am not sure what.
There are a couple of issues here. The first is the issue of time. In the IDV reader, we use the time_nominal variable in the file as the time of the observation. The idea was that this would indicate a nominal time (12Z, 12:20Z, 12:40Z) that would create a grouping of time, not the observation time which would vary on the order of minutes. As you know, GEMPAK and McIDAS group observations into blocks of time (what I think of as nominal time). This is why we prefer to use the ADDE interface to point data instead of netCDF. For your file, I end up with 45 time steps. You may have to turn on animation to see data at the various steps, or see the steps below. Second, the station model you pick may not be showing up the observations. Right now, there is no way to specify which station model to use by default for the netCDF files like there is for the ADDE interface. So, once you load in the file and display it as point obs, make sure you are using something like the METAR or Temperature station model (select from the control window). When I use either of these, your data displays with no problem. You can create your own station models to show the variables you want if neither of these is satisfactory. Another thing you can do to get around the time issue is to select the "Show All Times at Once" checkbox in the Point Data Plot control window to see all the times plotted at once. The upside is that you can see all the reports in the file (accounting for the decluttering setting of course). The downside is that you have no distinction between main hour and intermediate (special) reports and if you had more than one time step in the file, you'd lose the distinction between hours. At this point, the IDV reading of netCDF point data is not optimal and we will be working on that over the next few months. As you see, it does not handle time well and does not handle loading multiple files very well. It does not handle loading data through DODS (or HTTP I see, but that's easily correctable). At this point, the only netCDF data sources that can be easily cataloged and read by the IDV are grid. There's still a lot of middleware that needs to be developed to handle other types of data. We will be using the new netCDF interface if possible to improve that. In the mean time, I would suggest using the ADDE interface which provides you with time selection and the ability to set the preferred station model. This will also allow you to test your ADDE setup. Hopefully, we will be able to create a similar (and improved) interface for netCDF data. However, issues of time selection will still be problematic given the nature of the data. If you have any suggestions on how we should handle that, please let us know. As a member of the IDV Steering Committee, you'll get the chance to provide input on whatever interfaces we develop. Thanks for bringing these issues to the forefront. Don ************************************************************* Don Murray UCAR Unidata Program dmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx P.O. Box 3000 (303) 497-8628 Boulder, CO 80307 http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/donm "There's someone in my head, but it's not me" Roger Waters *************************************************************
decoders
archives: