NOTE: The difax mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Gilbert- My personal thoughts: Gilbert Sebenste <sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If Unidata is willing to drop the Alden contract (actually, it may be the other way around now!), I would be willing to pay for DiFAX, coming through the LDM, from Unisys.
Unidata does not have a contract with Alden to provide DIFAX via LDM, each individual site has their own contract. Please re-read Dave Fulker's note of August 28 which explains this and Unidata position on the future of DIFAX. Also, for DIFAX related issues, difax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is perhaps a better forum. ldm-users is intended for discussing LDM specific issues, such as problems with the program or (unfortunately, IMHO) IDD data problems. There is only a very small subset of the entire ldm-users list that depends on Alden for data, DIFAX or otherwise. There are other users on that list that use LDM, but who do not even participate in the IDD - NWS, private companies, etc. I appreciate you trying to keep other Alden customers informed, but using ldm-users to distribute this information may give the impression that the successful operation of the IDD is still dependent on Alden's participation, which it is not. It may be moot at this point, but I'm sure Unidata would be willing to set up an alden-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list for discussion of Alden related problems. Again, these are my personal thoughts.Don
difax archives: