Re: [galeon] Simple CF-netCDF file WCS response?

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

Thanks for clearing that up.  For the record I agree with Dom in that
if there is no extra information in the XML manifest, a WCS should
just be able to return a single NetCDF file.  I guess there might be
an issue that a client needs to know whether it is getting an XML file
or NetCDF file.  I'm not familiar with WCS 1.1.0 but maybe the client
could detect the MIME type of the response or perhaps the client could
explicitly request whether or not to obtain a manifest.

Jon

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Dominic Lowe <d.lowe@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jon,

 To give some background on this - I put forward a change request to the WCS
 group suggesting that we allow a WCS to return a single file with no
 accompanying XML manifest. This was the standard functionality of WCS 1.0.0
 but was removed for version 1.1.0.

 Currently (1.1.0) a WCS must request with a Multipart MIME or with a Coverages
 XML document that points to the coverage file(s). Unlike 1.0.0 there is no
 option to just return a single file (netcdf in this case). I felt that both
 these other options required more effort on the part of the consumer (effort
 that may be worthwhile in some cases, but may just be additional overhead in
 other cases). Therefore I would like to see the simple response reinstated.

 So unadorned in this sense means without the XML manifest, as opposed to
 without CF metadata.

 Here is the change request:
 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=23130&version=1

 Cheers,
 Dom




  • 2008 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: