Re: [galeon] Features and Coverages

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

Earlier, when Ben said "did I leave anything out?", I held back from mentioning vocabularies because I thought they were out of scope of the discussion. Two sentences in this email (highlighted below) made me decide to bring them up, however.

I *think* I understand what Ben means when he says OGC O&M "are so general they don't provide the detail needed..." : In and of themselves, SWE/O&M don't cover as written don't cover many semantic (and occasionally syntactic) details -- it is left to the user community to provide those specifics, the way OOSTethys did. (Is that what you mean?) NetCDF with CF provides a lot of that additional detail.

At the same time, I have to say that the CF-netCDF encoding was also insufficient for two of the communities I've dealt with. For one example, to my understanding the OceanSITES profile had to lay out a number of additional 'required attributes' for netCDF/CF to be sufficient to describe those sites' data sets. In the second case, a number of users with their own data sets found the CF vocabulary insufficient, and no suitable way to support additional vocabularies in the netCDF/CF context. (I want to submit a CF change request on this last point. As soon as I can figure out the right thing to request.)

I don't think this cuts against any of the rest of Ben's email, but I wanted to be clear that the topics addressed so far are necessary, but not sufficient, to provide community interoperability for most non- trivial communities. A sufficiently integrated semantic concept is also necessary to close the circuit.

John



On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Ben Domenico wrote:

Another way to look at this is that the information models of ISO 19123 and the OGC O&M are indeed general enough at the conceptual level to encompass our data collections. *** However, they are so general that they don't provide the detail needed to ensure that our data is useful by other communities. On the other hand, WCS with CF- netCDF encoding has been shown to provide sufficient detail to enable a handful of clients and servers to interoperate with one another on a limited subset of the data collections in the GALEON community. ***


--------------
John Graybeal   <mailto:graybeal@xxxxxxxxx>  -- 831-775-1956
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org



  • 2008 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: