NOTE: The galeon
mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Hi, Earlier emails mentioned the possibility of proposing CF-netCDF as a separate OGC standard, the feedback has been generally very positive. A few issues have been raised, but solutions have been suggested that appear to be reasonable. -- Regarding control of the both CF and netCDF, it would remain where it is now. So that should not be an issue. -- In terms of copyright of the material in the OGC specification documents that pertains directly to CF and/or netCDF, other organizations in similar circumstances have granted the Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. (OGC) a nonexclusive, royalty-free, paid up, worldwide license to copy and distribute this document and to modify this document and distribute copies of the modified version. This seems to make sense. -- As to the current effort to establish CF-netCDF as an officially sanctioned encoding extension to the WCS specification, our intention is to continue full speed ahead in parallel with that initiative. The experience with be invaluable and the approach we have taken thus far looks like it will work well in that the parts of the document specifically pertaining to CF and netCDF are pretty well separated from the sections describing the WCS protocol interactions. It will be good to get additional feedback at the next OGC Technical Committee meetings in June, but so far it appears to be worth pursuing actively. -- Ben
galeon
archives: