NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Robin, Alexandre wrote:
Its true that NetCDF is just another legacy file format. But its also true that NetCDF is a *general-purpose* scientific data format, that is not specific to meteorology, climate research, or any earth science discipline. In this sense it is different from NITF or NMEA, or GRIB or BUFR, or any domain specific format. This is an important distinction which is both a strength and weakness for transporting binary data.Hi Steven,I understand that you don’t have time to spend in OGC however if non of the major players are involved in the process and keep pushing their own legacy formats instead then for sure our standards are doomed…You know NetCDF is not the only one. The military has NITF and a bunch of STANAG standards, meteorology people have their own, navigation has NMEA, etc… All of them are heavily used throughout their community and required great investments. Some of them actually deal with coverages, ocean or atmospheric data so they do overlap with NetCDF earth science focus. So which ones do we pick?
(BTW, the file format hadnt changed in 15 years, when a few years ago we added one variation to allow sizes to exceed 2 Gb. So there are now exactly two variations of the "netCDF classic file format". Note that im not talking about netCDF-4/HDF5 format, which has many variants.)
None of this is all that important, as Bryan rightly point out. The hard stuff is the semantics.
galeon archives: