NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Hi all, The CF-netCDF SWG session was held Thursday morning September 22, 2011 at UCAR in Boulder. A summary is given below. If anyone who attended the SWG has additions or corrections, please let us know. -- Ben ========================================== *CF-netCDF SWG Session at the September 2011 OGC TC Meetings in Boulder* *Agenda* The agenda consisted of: 1. CF extension to the netCDF core standard (Stefano Nativi) 2. CF-netCDF extension to the WCS core standard (Stefano Nativi) 3. Enhanced Data Model extension to the netCDF core standard (Ben Domenico) 4. Uncertainty model for netCDF-CF (Lorenzo Bigagli and Stefano Nativi) 5. Determine how to deal with errors in existing netCDF binary standard noted by Simon Cox (see next slide) Item 5 was taken care of in brief discussions with Carl Reed and Simon Cox outside the SWG session. They both agree that the changes are not substantive, so the typos can be corrected in the existing spec and a phrase can be inserted clarifying that Requirement 1 is a special type of requirement, namely, a dependency. The presentations and draft documents are available at: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/index.php?m=projects&a=view&project_id=82&tab=2&artifact_id=45016 *Issues* A couple additional issues came up during the discussion - There is a need to register a mime type for netCDF with IANA. The question is whether to try to come up with all the modifiers (e.g. netCDF-3, netCDF-4, netCDF-CF,…) before submitting request. The sense of the group is that a base mime type necdf should be registered with modifiers for netCDF-, netCDF-4, CF-netCDF, etc. - With the new modular approach to specifications, OGC is creating a bit of a Humpty Dumpty Problem of having too many modules in specs, too many conformance classes within modules, etc. As a consequence, potential new users can be overwhelmed. It isn't always clear how to assemble fragments into a coherent, working whole. Primers with an overall overview are a help by not a solution. One new possibility is to emphasize the need for overview information in Profile specs where the application to a particular community is documented. *Action Items* (all internal to the SWG) - Make non-substantive edits to existing netCDF binary encoding spec. See note in Agenda above. (Ben Domenico) - In the CF Extension to netCDF core, some items that are optional for CF are mandatory in the proposed OGC specification. A list of these items will be circulated with the call for comments. (Stefano Nativi) - The CF-netCDF overview and planning documents should indicate that XML-encoding is addressed in CF-netCDF extension to WCS. (Ben Domenico) - Discussion paper for netCDF uncertainty conventions will be captured in a discussion paper for next TC. Will include netCDF3 and netCDF4 options and will pursue with CF conventions community in parallel (Lorenzo Bigagli) *Motions* There were no motions at this SWG
galeon archives: