The likely problem lies in the rewrite of the DG/GD library routines that Garp is using. Possibly an incorrect number of arguments or uninitialized value in the Garp routine that we can check for. Steve Chiswell Unidata User Support On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:28, Robert Mullenax wrote:
It does appear that way in his example. Here is what I see a lot of the time with Isotachs at 10m
gembud
archives: