With wide distribution of AWIPS-II on the (event?) horizon, and with NWS
and the National Centers all going toward AWIPS-II, and speaking as someone
who doesn't use it operationally at all, I'm not sure bridging the
differences are a priority any more. I understand that Gempak will continue
to hang around (a good thing, in my mind) but I'd concentrate on learning
and using AWIPS-II.
There are folks on here who've got more informed, and more official
opinions. Hopefully they'll comment.
gerry
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Pettee, Warren <wpettee@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I was just curious, has anyone ever attempted to bridge the
> functionality gap that exists between N-AWIPS and AWIPS? Mainly functions
> provided by D2D and LAPS that are not readily available in N-AWIPS. I'm
> still warming up to the abilities of GEMPAK, so I could be missing
> something in my argument here.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Warren
>
>
>
>
>
> *Warren Pettee Undergraduate - Meteorology *Department of Geography and
> Earth Sciences
> University of North Carolina at Charlotte
> 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223
> wpettee@xxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> gembud mailing list
> gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
--
Gerry Creager
NSSL/CIMMS
405.325.6371
++++++++++++++++++++++
“Big whorls have little whorls,
That feed on their velocity;
And little whorls have lesser whorls,
And so on to viscosity.”
Lewis Fry Richardson (1881-1953)
