I just did build ldm-6.12.4 on the same CentOS 7 machine - had to
install a few prerequisites since I had started with a minimal install
(pax and libxml2-devel weren't there yet) but after that built without
any problems, that I can tell.
I'm not doing much with it, just requesting some grib files from a local
ldm server and saving them as grib files, but it does seem to work.
One thing - and I have seen this on CentOS 6 machines as well - the
modifications to the /etc/rsyslog.conf only partially work.
The line for the ldm log at the end works fine:
local0.* /usr/local/ldm/var/logs/ldmd.log
But the combination of trying to eliminate ldm messages from
/var/log/messages
*.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none /var/log/messages
local0.none /var/log/messages
does not work as expected. Messages are still logged to
/var/log/messages in this configuration. I had to add the local0.none to
the first line so all appear on the same line, and then it works
correctly so that ldm messages are not logged to /var/log/messages.
*.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none;local0.none /var/log/messages
#local0.none /var/log/messages\
Pete
On 08/25/2014 02:55 PM, Michael James wrote:
Pete,
Did you also build the LDM on CentOS 7? If so what was your experience?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Pete Pokrandt <poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Steve,
I built GEMPAK 7.1.0 on CentOS 7 64 bit and from what I remember,
there were no issues, compiled out of the box. Which kind of
surprised me, because there are a LOT of changes between CentOS
6.x and CentOS 7.
I did have to add in values for GARPHOME and GARP_PATH to the
Gemenviron file to get garp to run, but as far as I can tell it's
running fine.
Pete
On 08/25/2014 01:51 PM, wxprofessor@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:wxprofessor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious if anyone here has built GEMPAK from source on
CentOS 7. Are there any issues to be aware of? We have a
new machine and are debating which CentOS to put on it.
i have one gempak installation on centos 6.5 because that's
what is stated for awips II edex / cave... i have found over
the years that for GEMPAK / ldm only, debian works the best
for me, but that's just personal preference.. since raytheon /
unidata are sticking with centos for awips II, i gave it a
shot.. if you double check you prerequisites, and check your
logs for errors during compile (dev versions is what I often
miss on a fresh box), you'll be fine
cheers,
--patrick
--
---------------------------------------------------
Patrick L. Francis
Vice President of Research & Development
Media Logic Group
http://www.medialogicgroup.com
http://www.hamweather.com
http://www.alertsbroadcaster.com
http://www.weathernationtv.com
http://www.modelweather.com
FB: http://www.facebook.com/wxprofessor
Skype: wxprofessor
AOL IM: wxprofessor
GTalk: wxprofessor@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:wxprofessor@xxxxxxxxx>
---------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
gembud mailing list
gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
--
Pete Pokrandt - Systems Programmer
UW-Madison Dept of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
608-262-3086 <tel:608-262-3086> - poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
gembud mailing list
gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
--
Pete Pokrandt - Systems Programmer
UW-Madison Dept of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
608-262-3086 - poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
