I see two options (since you don't want to use two machines).
If you insert the products into the queue originally, then
you could insert each set of data as a seperate feedtype.
If this is an existing feed, that you need to split
up, then you could put a matching pattern in your
pqact.conf and reinsert the product into the queue
using pqinsert and specifying a different feedtype.
Then just allow by feedtypes as usual. Should work, haven't
tried it.
David
> It's really that they SHOULDN'T get any data that is not intended to them.
>
> Daniel
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Emmerson [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 21 November, 2003 17:07
> > To: Lemay,Daniel [CMC]
> > Cc: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
> >
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > >Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:45:47 -0500
> > >From: "Lemay,Daniel [CMC]" <Daniel.Lemay@xxxxxxxx>
> > >To: "'Steve Emmerson'" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: RE: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
> >
> > The above message contained the following:
> >
> > > Suppose that I'm in the following situation:
> > ...
> > > -I want to be sure that my "clients" can only obtain the files that
> > > are intend for them. I don't want to rely on the fact they
> > will choose
> > > themselves the subset of the feed I allow them. I know that
> > I cannot
> > > insert a regular expression in my ALLOW statement to restrict what
> > > files they will have access.
> >
> > That's an interesting situation (and one that I haven't considered).
> >
> > Is it the case that each downstream site SHOULDN'T get the
> > other's data or that such feed-requests would merely be inefficient?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steve Emmerson
> >
