Yea, I already beat the GEMPAK Java thing to death on the gembud list myself.
-----Original Message-----
From: ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Ray Weber
Sent: Sun 3/30/2008 8:23 AM
To: Robert Mullenax; Tyler Allison; LDM-USERS
Subject: Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
Well like Tyler said, Java certainly doesnt produce trim fast code, so
a Java based gempak will likely be a step backward in performance.
Sorry if off topic a little..
Ray Weber
MA Skywarn
-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert Mullenax" <Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tyler Allison" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LDM-USERS"
<ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:28:51 -0500
Subject: Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
Well another me, too I guess.
Well, if panic is setting in over GEMPAK going away (or going to Java), the
double panic for this. I don't want to sound ungrateful, but I can't
imagine a worst decision than replacing LDM. Why must the computing world
continually change and upgrade for the sake of change and upgrade?
LDM is universally recognized as an incredibly stable and dependable
program. Can Unidata provide information on who is seeking a replacement
for LDM?
Robert Mullenax
CSBF/NMSU
