The choices for files of this size are ext2 if you don't care about
journaling, or XFS. XFS has its own share of problems but does work very
well.
gerry
Tyler Allison wrote:
We switched off of ext3 for our data partitions for high speed IO. It blows
chunks compared to ext2. You loose journaling but I don't care. I don't have
long term storage.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 25, 2010, at 3:10 PM, "Jeff Lake - Admin" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
yep both 7200 SATA2's
was considering a Velociraptor 10K RPM but at the xtra $60/m .... need to
really consider long and hard
Jeff,
If your disk RPM isn't at least 7200, your I/O is going to be bad with Level2/3
feeds.
*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste ********
(My opinions only!) ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ***
web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu **
*******************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
ldm-users mailing list
ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
_______________________________________________
ldm-users mailing list
ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
_______________________________________________
ldm-users mailing list
ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
--
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
