Tim will almost certainly get the message...
FOr the record, though, unless things have changed, all data now goes to
redundant servers at SRH and MAX gigapop (or perhaps TOC), from whence
it's distributed to OU, Purdue, ECREN, and from THOSE to downstream
customers.
I've suggested strongly to NWS OCIO that this was not a robust network
design but I probably wasn't circumspect enough... they didn't want to
look at alternatives.
I'm still seeing significant latency in completion of the data. I'm
going to try to ascertain where we're currently feeding (OU is my BEST
source but not my only one) and see if there's an upstream ntp problem
or bandwidth contention problem.
gc
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Jeff Lake - Admin wrote:
better check again Ray
ldmadmin watch -f nexrad2
is null and void here
It just started flowing via TAMU. Huh. Odd.
*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste
********
(My opinions only!) ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ***
web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu **
*******************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
ldm-users mailing list
ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
--
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843