Unidata certainly doesn't guarantee operationally timely access to CONDUIT, and
it should not either with Level II data distribution. They are both just too
huge to assure that. I'd like to see a response from Unidata on this.
-----Original Message-----
From: ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Robert Mullenax
Sent: Sun 5/18/2014 10:00 PM
To: Karen Cooper - NOAA Affiliate
Cc: LDM Users
Subject: Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2/NEXRAD3 lag?
Sorry, I am not dissing NSSL at all. I just thought that since Blaire was at a
dot com address that there might be a better routing for him. If NSSL says that
anyone that is somehow allowed access regardless of .com or .edu staus can get
20 second max latency then I am surely dropping out of this conversation.
It's all pretty confusing since Unidata has always distanced themselves from
anything operational..and it surely is a participant in the Level II feed.
Getting back out of this hornet's nest..
-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Cooper - NOAA Affiliate [mailto:karen.cooper@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sun 5/18/2014 9:51 PM
To: Robert Mullenax
Cc: daryl herzmann; Blair Trosper; LDM Users
Subject: Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2/NEXRAD3 lag?
I also just checked the IRADS data monitoring page. Only members have
access to it, but it keeps an avg. and max latency for the Level II data.
Scanning the monitoring page the maximum latencies I see at IRADS is less
than 20 seconds, and in most cases, less than 5 seconds.
I can tell you at NSSL, we are very sensitive to latencies and would be
well aware of 10 minute latencies in our realtime WDSSII system.
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Robert Mullenax <
Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Isn't the shear volume if data in the Level 2 feed make it immune to
> anyone in the Unidata IDD complaining about a 10 minute lag? Aren't their
> commercial providers of Level 2 that have a more direct feed?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of daryl herzmann
> Sent: Sun 5/18/2014 9:03 PM
> To: Blair Trosper
> Cc: LDM Users
> Subject: Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2/NEXRAD3 lag?
>
> On Sun, 18 May 2014, Blair Trosper wrote:
>
> > Daryl @ IAState.edu would be one of the other ones who's noticed this off
> > the top of my head. Maybe he could chime in from two or so weeks ago
> when
> > this first started.
>
> Hmmm, do you read the emails that I write you? Here is my last one again
>
>
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/archives/ldm-users/2014/msg00059.html
>
>
> daryl
>
> --
> /**
> * Daryl Herzmann
> * Assistant Scientist -- Iowa Environmental Mesonet
> * http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu
> */
>
> _______________________________________________
> ldm-users mailing list
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ldm-users mailing list
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
--
"Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
-------------------------------------------
Karen.Cooper@xxxxxxxx
Phone: 405-325-6982
Cell: 405-834-8559
Lynker Technologies
National Severe Storms Laboratory
