Thanks for the info. Our forecasters will ,hopefully, be less annoyed at me.
Dave
From: Gilbert Sebenste [mailto:gilbert@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 4:42 PM
To: David Fitzgerald <David.Fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
'ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: uniwisc feed receive times
Hi David,
Yes it is. GOES-16 is much faster via NOAAport, but with GOES-15, a delay like
that is normal.
Gilbert
Gilbert Sebenste
Staff Meteorologist
Environmental Health and Safety
Labs for Wellness 154 | DeKalb, Illinois 60115
815-753-5492
gilbert@xxxxxxx<mailto:gilbert@xxxxxxx>
http://weather.admin.niu.edu<http://weather.admin.niu.edu/>
Everyone. Home. Safely.
[NIU]
From:
ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Fitzgerald
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 11:27 AM
To: 'ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
<ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [ldm-users] uniwisc feed receive times
Hi Everyone,
We have noticed that our UNIWISC feeds seem to be running up to 30 minutes
behind the product creation time. Our weather station people are annoyed the
imagery is so late.
For example, the line shown below is from an `ldmadmin watch -f UNIWISC`
command showing a GOES-13 image:
20170328T141114.365590Z pqutil[29006] INFO pqutil.c:1181:display_watch()
741505 20170328141111.455496 UNIWISC 000 pnga2area Q3 UE 1231 GOES-13_IMG
13.3um 4km 20170328 1345
This shows we got the image at 1411, and was sent to us from our upstream site
only a few seconds earlier. But the image time is for 1345.
Is anyone else seeing this, and is this a normal lag between image creation and
dissemination?
Dave
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
David Fitzgerald
Information Technology
Millersville University
Millersville, PA 17551
Phone: 717-871-7436
E-Mail:
david.fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:david.fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
