how did you calculate that 47865.791666666511 was the correct value for your desired time? Rich Signell wrote:
Folks, Sorry, typo. To avoid possible confusion: I wrote:As a test, I tried adding 0.5 milliseconds to my time value: 47865.791666666511 + 1/24/3600/1000 = 47865.79166667230But I meant:As a test, I tried adding 0.5 milliseconds to my time value: 47865.791666666511 + 0.5/24/3600/1000 = 47865.79166667230-Rich
netcdf-java
archives: