Ok, Since the library is only Alpha, is there any list of known issues or known
properly working functionality?
I need it only for writing pretty simple but large files...
Thanks,
Mark Balonkin
________________________________________
От: John Caron [caron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Отправлено: 11 декабря 2008 г. 17:49
Кому: Mark Balonkin
Копия: netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Тема: Re: [netcdf-java] NetCDF-java 4.0 release?
Sorry, confusing names.
"the latest 4.0 library supports writing netcdf-3 large files" means
the latest java-netcdf 4.0 library, see java-netcdf home page:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/
Mark Balonkin wrote:
> But there is no Java library which support large files writing. Is it correct?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Caron [mailto:caron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 11 декабря 2008 г. 17:12
> To: Mark Balonkin
> Cc: netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [netcdf-java] NetCDF-java 4.0 release?
>
> the latest 4.0 library supports writing netcdf-3 large files, see
> NetcdfFileWriteable:
>
> /**
> * Set if this should be a "large file" (64-bit offset) format.
> * Must be in define mode
> * @param isLargeFile true if large file
> */
> public void setLargeFile(boolean isLargeFile);
>
> Mark Balonkin wrote:
>> Do you mean Java library for netcdf-3?
>> I'm using:
>> - Java 2.2.20 lib, which doesn't support large files and
>> - "C" library netcdf version 3.6.1 with .net wrapper, which support large
>> files.
>>
>> I don't really need netcdf-4, the critical feature is large file support, so
>> this one is enough.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Caron [mailto:caron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 11 декабря 2008 г. 16:40
>> To: Mark Balonkin
>> Cc: netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [netcdf-java] NetCDF-java 4.0 release?
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark Balonkin wrote:
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are thinking about implementation of java wrapper on “C” netcdf library.
>>> Basically because we need
>> large file support and also would be good to have better
>> performance. We don’t need the whole functionality,
>> just a basic writing. But anyway it’s still a bunch of work.
>>
>>
>> the latest 4.0 library supports writing netcdf-3 large files, but
>> not netcdf-4.
>>
>> i doubt performance is a good enough reason to do all that work, but
>> it would be interesting to see some timings.
>>
