NOTE: The netcdf-porting mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
"Sat\, 14 Mar 2009 08\:25\:05 +0100") Message-ID: <sadr610kx5h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Loop: netcdf-porting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Benoit Lecocq <blq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > (smtp0a.arcane-networks.net [213.251.175.43]); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:25:05 +0100 > (CET) > X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9107/Sat Mar 14 06:25:15 2009 on > smtp0a.arcane-networks.net > X-Virus-Status: Clean > X-Loop: netcdf-porting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Hi, > > I try to upgrade the OpenBSD port with the latest release of NETCDF 4.0 > C/C++/Fortran. > All is OK with the compilation but the regression test failed with utf8. > > I try this : > > http://mailman.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/archives/netcdfgroup/2008/msg00189.html > > but I obtain : > > ... > PASS: tst_lengths.sh > *** creating UTF-8 test file tst_utf8.nc...ok. > *** Tests successful! > PASS: tst_utf8 > > *** Testing ncgen and ncdump for UTF8 support... > *** creating classic offset file with utf8 characters... > *** dump and compare utf8 output... > Binary files utf8.cdl and ./ref_tst_utf8.cdl differ > FAIL: run_utf8_tests.sh > ========================================= > 1 of 8 tests failed > Please report to support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > ========================================= Howdy Benoit! I am trying to arrange access to an OpenBSD system for testing. Meanwhile, take a look at the tst_utf8.cdl and the ref_tst_utf8.cdl files. The test is complaing that they are not the same. What is different about them? I have entered this into the netcdf support system as an issue that will be tracked properly until it's resolved. Thanks, Ed -- Ed Hartnett -- ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
netcdf-porting archives: