Hi Joe:
See http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/faq.html#Large%
20File%20Support0. It has been possible since netcdf3.6
Regards,
-Roy M
On Feb 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Joe Sirott wrote:
Hi,
In the "classic" netCDF file format (netCDF-3), a variable without a
record dimension cannot be larger than 2GB. This limitation has been
giving me a lot of headaches lately. I know that netCDF-4 is
supposed to
solve this problem, but there are a number of reasons why netCDF-4 is
not a good option for me (no Java write support, for one).
I could be missing something, but it seems like a very small change to
the netCDF-3 file format would solve this problem. The only
requirement
would be changing the variable size info in the netCDF header from
a 32
bit to a 64 bit int (and, of course, updating the version info in the
header).
I'm guessing that I'm not the only netCDF user who has run into this
problem and who is also reluctant to move to netCDF-4. Any possibility
that Unidata could make these changes?
Cheers,
Joe S.
_______________________________________________
netcdfgroup mailing list
netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: http://
www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
**********************
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S.
Government or NOAA."
**********************
Roy Mendelssohn
Supervisory Operations Research Analyst
NOAA/NMFS
Environmental Research Division
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950-2097
e-mail: Roy.Mendelssohn@xxxxxxxx (Note new e-mail address)
voice: (831)-648-9029
fax: (831)-648-8440
www: http://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/
"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."