Hi folks,
My current understanding is that if one increases the length of a netCDF
attribute then this will trigger a costly rewrite operation on the whole
file since the header section is of fixed size. At least for netCDF-3
files, I think.
But does this file rewrite penalty apply if the *net* change in header
length arising from a series of attribute changes is zero or less? Put
another way, is the basic constraint the overall length of the header
section, or the length of the individual attribute that one is planning
to change ?
Some simple tests using ncatted suggest that it's the former - the
length of the header section - though it would be useful to have this
confirmed or refuted.
For example, I make changes to a series of text attributes such that
they are now all shorter in length. This presumably frees up space in
the header section. I then increase the length of some other attribute
(perhaps a vector of ints). But that increase in length is accommodated
by the space freed up earlier. So in this case a file rewrite/copy
operation is not triggered, right?
Lastly, I notice that it's possible to add some padding to the header
section using the h_minfree parameter to the nc__enddef() function. Is
it possible therefore to query the current amount of free space in the
header section? I couldn't immediately see a function for doing that.
TIA,
Phil
