Re: [netcdfgroup] what is status of netCDF3 vs netCDF4?

2014-11-06 18:04 GMT+00:00 Chris Barker <chris.barker@xxxxxxxx>:

>
> Quick comment on this:
>
> a previous post seemed to imply that Python was supported. I think the C
>> and Fortran libraries should be top priority,
>
>
> the netCDF4 python package is a wrapper around the C lib.
>
> So it is as robust as the C lib, but also just as hard to compile!
>
> I agree that C and Fortran are key (actually primarily C -- you should be
> abel to call C from Fortran anyway) And C gets you the ability to wrap for
> a whole pile of higher-level languages (Julia, Octave, R, etc....)
>
I think both are key! (you can similarly call fortran from C...)

>
> That leaves us with the Java world -- which does not map so easily to C
>
> What about .net, by the way? I don't care, but maybe some folks do ;-) I
> have no idea how hard it is to call C from .net languages...
>
> -Chris
>
> --
>
> Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
> Oceanographer
>
> Emergency Response Division
> NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
> 7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
> Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception
>
> Chris.Barker@xxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> netcdfgroup mailing list
> netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>



-- 
Kind regards Nick
  • 2014 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the netcdfgroup archives: