Actually, the term "netcdf-5" got usurped by the
developers of pnetcdf, which supports a slightly extended
version of netcdf-3. The most recent versions of the netcdf-c
library support the netcdf-5 format
So the next available number would
be netcdf-6.
You might look at this.
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/en/entry/high-performance-netcdf-4-proposal
=Dennis Heimbigner
Unidata
On 11/1/2017 1:27 PM, Julian Kunkel wrote:
Dear all,
there was many years ago the April fool:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/entry/netcdf_5_format_to_be
I'm just curious if there are activities known by you that actually
move on towards any NetCDF-5 format?
Regards,
Julian