Hi All:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Hoop wrote:
> Ethan,
>
> I looked at the featureCollection documentation link you gave, but since
> our data are not forecasts, nor point data, nor in GRIB2 format, that
> didn't seem the right fit. Maybe I'm wrong; I'm severely sleep-deprived
> right now....
>
Awhile back I wrote, and never got a response, that "featureCollection"
appeared to now be the preferred method to do aggregations, but the docs were
really unclear as to how to do this for simple aggregations, or even if for the
present version of TDS it is the preferred method.
What would really help is if it could be a clear statement as to whether
featureCollection is the preferred method, if the what has been the usual
method through "datascan" and the like will be deprecated in the future, and
clear documentation on not only setting up aggregations using
featureCollection, but good (ie realistic, not trivial) examples of converting
existing aggregations to featureCollection.
Thanks
-Roy
**********************
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S.
Government or NOAA."
**********************
Roy Mendelssohn
Supervisory Operations Research Analyst
NOAA/NMFS
Environmental Research Division
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950-2097
e-mail: Roy.Mendelssohn@xxxxxxxx (Note new e-mail address)
voice: (831)-648-9029
fax: (831)-648-8440
www: http://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/
"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."
"From those who have been given much, much will be expected"
"the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" -MLK Jr.
