On Apr 2, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Robert Mullenax <Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> >> I would also add that depending on bundles from Unidata is short sighted.
> >> As has been noted Unidata is not 24/7. The great thing about GEMPAK is it
> >> forces you to be self sufficient at least to the point where you are
> >> responsible for your own downloads. Maybe a greater reliance on local
> >> datasets would be a good thing for IDV. I know that GEMPAK and McIDAS are
> >> passé but their are advantages..even in the teaching and research realm.
Robert,
One of the great things about the IDV (by design, from the beginning) is that
it can do either (that is, display local or remote data) with equal facility.
Your suggestion would therefore be aimed at the IDV user (or creater of
bundles) rather than the IDV developers. :-)
-- Dave
***************************************************************
* Dr. Dave Dempsey | ^ ___ \|/ *
* Dept. of Earth & Climate Sciences | ) ^ /||_||\ --0-- *
* San Francisco State University | ) ) / ||_|| \ /|\ *
* 1600 Holloway Ave. | ) ) / ||_|| \
*
* San Francisco, CA 94132 | ) ) / ||_|| \ ^ *
* | ) ) )
||_|| \ *
* Phone: (415) 338-7716 | ) ) )~||~||~~~~ \~~*
* FAX: (415) 338-7705 | ) ) ) ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~*
* Email: dempsey@xxxxxxxx | ) ) ) ) ) ~ ~ ~ ~ *
***************************************************************
