Hello,
this is strange. I've got a small example that runs ok. There were a
handful of points. In my app, however, I have some 2000 points.
Triangulation is never a problem, but the thing refuses to resample. It
returns NaNs.
I've made sure the sets overlap and that the math types are the same.
I'm not ruling a mistake by myself, but... Any ideas about what might be
going wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Ugo
Tom Rink wrote:
Hi Ugo,
This operation is implemented, and should work. There can
be problems sometimes with precision and coincident data
points. If your willing to post a small program or the data to
the list we can take a look.
TomR
Ugo Taddei wrote:
Hi,
there I go again on the subject of irregular sets...
Is it possible to do something like
FlatField bigField = ...// large field with Irregular2DSet as domain set
Set smallSet = ...small irregular 2D set
FlatField smallField = (FlatField)bigField.resample( smallSet,
Data.WEIGHTED_AVERAGE, Data.NO_ERRORS);
Before I had a Linear2DSet as my smallSet, and it worked fine (but
"slow"). It is now returning "missing". The fields do (partially)
overlap, however. I expected at least some values to return NaNs.
I'm not sure if the mistake is somewhere else or if this is not
possible/implemented.
Thanks for the help,
Ugo
--
l a t / l o n GmbH
Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany
phone ++49 +228 184960 fax ++49 +228 732153
http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
