>Date: Thu, 22 Oct 92 09:47:44 -0700 >From: Joe Sirott <sirott@atmos.washington.edu> >To: netcdfgroup@unidata.ucar.edu >Subject: Re: Coordinate mapping conventions... In the above message, Joe Sirott wrote: >It seems to me that support for components and data to coordinate mapping >can be solved by adding a small extension to the netCDF language. Why not >add support for something analogous to C structures. For instance, we might >have the following definition: > > float u(lat,lon,depth); > float v(lat,lon,depth); > float w(lat,lon,depth); > struct velocity { u,v,w }; When performing I/O, would the above structure be dimensioned [lat,lon,depth,3] or [3,lat,lon,depth]? -------- Steve Emmerson <steve@unidata.ucar.edu>