I started writing down some ideas to extend the referential attribute idea, and it turned into a long document (complete with CDL examples! :). Essentially, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to actually name alternate coordinate systems for a variable in a referential attribute. A named coordinate system appears as a global attribute, which then lists the component variables in the coordinate system. I think it works well for the examples I tried. See this URL if interested: http://www.atd.ucar.edu/rdp/gjg/coords.html Gary