[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
20010718: HDF to AREA (cont.)
- Subject: 20010718: HDF to AREA (cont.)
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:59:08 -0600
>From: Darren Gallant <address@hidden>
>Organization: UCAR/JOSS
>Keywords: 200107091620.f69GKI102721 McIDAS HDF AREA
Darren,
>I have consulted the docments you mentioned. If I created a pre-calibrated
>WV areafile and a raw WV areafile, would the resulting images be the same?
No.
>Is any information lost by creating a pre-calibrated image?
Yes. The difference is basically a quantization of data values in the
1-byte image. The displays of the two images would be the same (since
the McIDAS image display is 8-bit), but math using the images would
probably be different.
I just checked the GOES-10 10.7 um AREAs that MSFC is creating (from
HDF files, I believe) and I see that they do NOT have calibration blocks
and store raw values:
imglist.k MSFC/GW-IR FORM=EXP
Pos Satellite/ Date Time Center Res (km) Image_Size
sensor Lat Lon Lat Lon
--- ------------- ------------ -------- ---- ---- ----- ----- ------------
3 G-10 IMG 18 JUL 01199 19:46:00 33 133
Band: 4 10.7 um Surface temp; longwave window 5.31 2.37 983 x 2856
proj: 0 created: 2001199 201543 memo:
type:GVAR cal type:RAW
offsets: data= 2816 navigation= 256 calibration= 0 auxillary= 0
doc length: 0 cal length: 0 lev length: 0 PREFIX= 0
valcod: 0 zcor: 1 avg-smp: A
lcor: 2645 ecor: 10053 bytes per pixel: 2 ss: 74
Resolution Factors (base=1): Line= 4.0 Element= 4.0
imglist.k: done
lwu.k LIST G10-200107181830.ir4.ara 0 64
0. 0 4 HEX: 0 4 ASCII:
2. 74 101199 HEX: 4A 18B4F ASCII: J O
4. 183000 2525 HEX: 2CAD8 9DD ASCII:
6. 7845 1 HEX: 1EA5 1 ASCII:
8. 1357 3312 HEX: 54D CF0 ASCII: M
10. 2 4 HEX: 2 4 ASCII:
12. 4 1 HEX: 4 1 ASCII:
14. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
16. 101199 195613 HEX: 18B4F 2FC1D ASCII: O
18. 8 0 HEX: 8 0 ASCII:
20. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
22. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
24. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
26. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
28. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
30. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
32. 0 2816 HEX: 0 B00 ASCII:
34. 256 0 HEX: 100 0 ASCII:
36. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
38. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
40. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
42. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
44. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
46. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
48. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
50. 0 1196835154 HEX: 0 47564152 ASCII: GVAR
52. 1380013856 0 HEX: 52415720 0 ASCII: RAW
54. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
56. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
58. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
60. 0 0 HEX: 0 0 ASCII:
62. 0 1 HEX: 0 1 ASCII:
64. 1196835154 0 HEX: 47564152 0 ASCII: GVAR
--END OF LISTING
Furthermore, the result from IMGPROBE shows the calibrated value of
the 2-byte counts in image:
<output from IMGPROBE>
Frame Latitude Longitude Tvline Tvelem Line Elem
11 37:48:35 118:55:47 202 640 4253 17721
Image Name Day Nominal Time Scan Time Band
---------------- ------- ------------ --------- ----
MSFC/GW-IR.3 18 Jul 01199 19:46:00 MISSING 4
File Nominal Image RAW RAD TEMP BRIT
Lat/Lon Line/Element Line/Element * K
37:48:35 / 118:55:47 402/ 1917 4253/17721 20928 122.08 306.50 48
* milliwatts/meter**2/steradian/(cm-1)
IMGPROBE: Done
So, it looks as if there is an interpretation of 2-byte counts to
things like Temperature for GVAR IR images even if a calibration block
does not exist. I am suprised by this, but stand corrected.
I first figured that the temperature must be calculated after scaling
the 2-byte raw values to 1-byte brightnesses. This, however, gives a
TEMP of 306 K, not 306.5 like is listed above. Further reading of
area2.doc did not shed additional light on what is going on, so I
looked at the GVAR calibration module code, kbxgvar.dlm and see that
there is a calculation for Tempertature based on radiance which is
calculated (actually, a lookup table is generated for the range of raw
values and then temperatures are interpolated).
All of this seems to mean that you should create your AREAs with the
2-byte data and then _assume_ that the standard calculations apply. I
believe that this is what Anthony G. meant by (the last sentence is the
operative one):
> Yes, we do have an HDF to McIDAS converter. It should in theory work for most
> datasets, except with the caveat that it expects navigation data to be in a
> separate file and different format (ascii). And as for calibration - it
> assumes it is GOES-8 so the cal. is internal to McIDAS so we don't do anything
> with that.
I hope that this helps...
Tom