All,
Well...a little more analysis and search gave me some bad news. I found a Csh
script with nice details on the different applications and the variable
pointing to the directory I had found. There is a lot missing.
Shall I post the make.out file here?
Paul
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S7.
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.xmsonormal, li.xmsonormal, div.xmsonormal
{mso-style-name:x_msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->-------- Original message --------From: "Paul H. Lewis" <phldml3@xxxxxxx>
Date: 12/19/18 10:57 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 'gembud' <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation
All, Well I have somewhat good news. It looks like I might have compiled the
source successfully. At least the system didn’t crash. One tutorial stated I
should be able to run gdplot from the command line. But I get an error when I
try that, stating that gdplot can’t be found. I haven’t found gdplot in the
directory structure yet, but I have found other apps like alist (I think that
was it!). Anyway, I think maybe my problem is that paths and environmental
variables may be off. Does that sound reasonable? Paul From: Tyle, Kevin R
[mailto:ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 4:02 PM
To: Paul H. Lewis <phldml3@xxxxxxx>
Cc: 'gembud' <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation Hi Paul, no problem! You’ll
find it in your GEMPAK7/config directory. Cheers, Kevin
_____________________________________________
Kevin Tyle, M.S., Manager of Departmental Computing
Dept. of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences
University at Albany
Earth Science 235, 1400 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12222
Email: ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 518-442-4578
_____________________________________________ From: Paul H. Lewis
[mailto:phldml3@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 5:00 PM
To: Tyle, Kevin R <ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Pete Pokrandt' <poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
'Michael James' <mjames@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'gembud' <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation Kevin, Thank you for this!
Sorry for the noob question, but where is the Makeinc.common_linux file
located? I found Makefile in …/GEMPAK7/extlibs/netCDF that has the following
line: NETCDF = $(OS-LIB)/libnetcdf.a I’m thinking that
is the line that you are saying needs replaced, but I’m hesitant to edit the
change with out confirmation. Best Regards,Paul From:
gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tyle, Kevin R
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 2:05 PM
To: Pete Pokrandt <poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael James <mjames@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: gembud <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation I can report that the
resulting HDF5 library errors are eliminated by editing Makeinc.common_linux so
that the NETCDF line reads: NETCDF = $(OS_LIB)/libnetcdf.a -ldl -lz
$(OS_LIB)/libhdf5_hl.a $(OS_LIB)/libhdf5.a
_____________________________________________
Kevin Tyle, M.S., Manager of Departmental Computing
Dept. of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences
University at Albany
Earth Science 235, 1400 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12222
Email: ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 518-442-4578
_____________________________________________ From: Pete Pokrandt
[mailto:poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 12:58 PM
To: Michael James <mjames@xxxxxxxx>; Tyle, Kevin R <ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gembud <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation To add to the conversation,
I had a student trying to build on OSX with similar hdf and netcdf issues.. I
haven't had a chance to look too deeply into it as she is back in China now,
but it sounds very much like what we're discussing here. Pete --
Pete Pokrandt - Systems Programmer
UW-Madison Dept of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
608-262-3086 - poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx From: gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Michael James <mjames@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 11:43 AM
To: Tyle, Kevin R
Cc: gembud
Subject: Re: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation Hi all, In NAWIPS 7.5.1,
NCEP added support to display netCDF 4 GOES-16/17 satellite imagery, and so the
library will be compiled with netcdf4 enabled from that release forward. In
August I began to merge the NCEP 7.5.1 changes into Unidata GEMPAK, and removed
the "–disable-netcdf4" flag from the extlibs build, but have held back on
releasing the 7.5.1 due to some compilation issues with the new im_rcdf4 and
gossae4 subroutines (which is why Unidata GEMPAK is at release 7.4.5 right
now). The RPMs and Debian binaries are containerized builds where on each OS
GEMPAK is built from source, so I know for certain that the CentOS builds are
complete *in those container environments* and within the installed RPMs.
However, it appears that the Debian build is broken because of this, as
mentioned here, and needs some attention from me to account for hdf5 and
netcdf4. Michael James Unidata Program CenterBoulder, CO On Mon, Dec 17,
2018 at 9:22 AM Tyle, Kevin R <ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:(haha, hit the send
button too aggressively) … last sentence should read: Maybe we could just go
back to not enabling netcdf4 when netcdf is built?
_____________________________________________
Kevin Tyle, M.S., Manager of Departmental Computing
Dept. of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences
University at Albany
Earth Science 235, 1400 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12222
Email: ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 518-442-4578
_____________________________________________ From:
gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tyle, Kevin R
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 11:18 AM
To: gembud <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation The configuration process
for netCDF, as set in $NAWIPS/extlibs/netCDF/Makefile has removed
–disable-netcdf4 which existed in earlier versions. This makes netcdf look for
locations of the hdf5 libraries and include directories. The latter is not
properly specified in $NAWIPS/extlibs/netCDF/makefile.common . The NCENV line
needs to have “CPPFLAGS=-I$(OS_INC)”. That eliminates the error with hdf5.inc
not being found, and thus the netcdf configuration and build proceeds. Howver,
later on in the build, errors linking to various hdf5 libraries occur, so some
more work needs to be done there. It’s unclear to me if there’s some
functionality in these most recent GEMPAK versions that require netCDF4 (and
thus HDF5), so I’m cc’ing Michael James here. Maybe we could just go back to
not _____________________________________________
Kevin Tyle, M.S., Manager of Departmental Computing
Dept. of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences
University at Albany
Earth Science 235, 1400 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12222
Email: ktyle@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 518-442-4578
_____________________________________________ From:
gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike Zuranski
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:41 PM
To: gembud <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gembud] Gempak-7.4.5.deb installation "Older versions of 7 built
on Ubuntu." This was true for me as well, same system, pretty sure it was
version 7.4.2. I looked at the GEMPAK Github page and saw they went with
updated versions of zlib, hdf5 and netcdf4 in 7.4.3, so I feel like that's
related. -Mike
======================Mike ZuranskiMeteorology Support AnalystCollege of
DuPage - NexlabWeather.cod.edu====================== On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at
3:15 PM Mullenax, Robert R. (WFF-820.0)[ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION]
<robert.r.mullenax@xxxxxxxx> wrote:I tried building on CentOS 7 and it failed
with NetCDF as well. I sent a message to Unidata about it but did not get an
auto reply from support-gempak so don’t know if they got it. I didn’t get a
reply from gembud either. I just used the CentOS rpm and it worked ok. I have
Ubuntu systems but have not tried to upgrade those yet. Older versions of 7
built on Ubuntu.
On Dec 16, 2018, at 2:04 PM, Mike Zuranski <zuranski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi
all, I ran into the same issue and then some... Traditionally I've always
built GEMPAK from source, but figured I'd try the .deb file this time. After
deploying it however, like Paul I didn't have most of the executables. Some of
the decoders got built, maybe one or two other things, but no gd, gp or most
other programs. So I tried building from source, but that didn't work either...
When building from source, it looked like it failed at making netCDF. I'm
writing this from home so I don't have any log files on me at the moment, but
it appeared as though it made HDF5 okay, but the netCDF build couldn't find
hdf5.h and failed. Without netCDF, those other programs failed as well. The
strange part was hdf5.h seemed like it existed in the right place, so I'm not
sure what happened. This was for both 7.4.3 and 7.4.5 on Ubuntu 18.04.1, I was
going to try on another machine before writing in about it in case it was
something local, but Paul described the same thing so maybe it's not just me.
Hope this provides some clues. If anyone wants more info, let me know and I
can include make & configure logs when I get in the office on Monday. -Mike
======================Mike Zuranski Meteorology Support AnalystCollege of
DuPage - Nexlab
