Dave,
I got the impression during all my tests that there may be a complication
due to the relative spatial extents of the two objects, the map and the
topo. Do you or the IDV folks know if there is some limitation/restriction
on the success of this formula, due to spatial relationship? And could
spatial subsetting (although I did not use it) play a role?
Murray
From: David P Dempsey [mailto:dempsey@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:15 PM
To: David Ahijevych
Cc: Murray Brown; idvusers
Subject: Re: [idvusers] painting map lines on 3D topography
On Oct 3, 2014, at 2:01 PM, David Ahijevych <ahijevyc@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:ahijevyc@xxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Hi,I have that problem too -- when I try a local GFS file, it doesn't
appear on the right side of the map/topo selection screen. Even when I
tried a GFS file from the Catalog it didn't show up as an option on the
right side..
David and Murray,
It seems to work for me (running IDV v.5.0u1 on a Mac, accessing a local GFS
analysis in GRIB2 format):
- Dave
***************************************************************
* Dr. Dave Dempsey, Chair | ^ ___ \|/ *
* Dept. of Earth & Climate Sciences | ) ^ /||_||\ --0-- *
* San Francisco State University | ) ) / ||_|| \ /|\ *
* 1600 Holloway Ave. | ) ) / ||_|| \ *
* San Francisco, CA 94132 | ) ) / ||_|| \ ^ *
* | ) ) ) ||_|| \ *
* Phone: (415) 338-7716 | ) ) )~~||~||~~~~~\~~ *
* FAX: (415) 338-7705 | ) ) ) ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ *
* Email: dempsey@xxxxxxxx <mailto:dempsey@xxxxxxxx> | ) ) )
) ) ~ ~ ~ ~ *
***************************************************************