Re: Test problem with F90 and V3.6.0

Hi Phillippe,

I have just tried the same version of netcdf with pgi 5.1-6 and
the 'make test' runs all the way through. However, inspecting
the output shows that one of the test failed, namely 'ncvarget'.
Nevertheless the 'Total number of failures' reported is 0!!! I
haven't seen the problem that you describe below.

Cheers, Jacob


* Philippe Poilbarbe <philippe.poilbarbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2005-01-12 14:51]:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a test problem with F90 and Version 3.6.0.
> 
> At the end of this message there is the output of the test program 
> (netcdf_test.f90).
> I have added an another trace output of the 'pressure' variable (print 
> *, pressure) to
> make sure that it is normal.
> 
> The environment is:
> uname -a: Linux px-105.ferme 2.6.7-1.492custom #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 
> 10:32:17 UTC 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
> Portland group F90 compiler: 5.1.3
> C compiler: gcc 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)
> 
> Did anybody have the same kind of problem ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ph.P.
> 
> ======================
> 
> netcdf_test.f90:
> ./netcdf_test
>    950.0000        951.0000        952.0000        953.0000
>    954.0000        955.0000        956.0000        957.0000
>    958.0000        959.0000        960.0000        961.0000
>    962.0000        963.0000        964.0000        965.0000
>    966.0000        967.0000        968.0000        969.0000
>    970.0000        971.0000        972.0000        973.0000
> example_good.cdl example.cdl sont différents: octet 881, ligne 37
> *** Failure ***
> *** example_good.cdl    2000-04-05 21:33:14.000000000 +0200
> --- example.cdl 2005-01-11 10:21:31.624884000 +0100
> ***************
> *** 34,43 ****
>    953, 954, 955,
>    956, 957, 958,
>    959, 960, 961,
> !   962, 963, 964,
> !   965, 966, 967,
> !   968, 969, 970,
> !   971, 972, 973 ;
> 
>   lat = -90, -87.5, -85, -82.5 ;
> 
> --- 34,43 ----
>    953, 954, 955,
>    956, 957, 958,
>    959, 960, 961,
> !   950, 951, 952,
> !   953, 954, 955,
> !   956, 957, 958,
> !   959, 960, 961 ;
> 
>   lat = -90, -87.5, -85, -82.5 ;
> 
> make[2]: *** [test] Erreur 1
> make[2]: Quitte le répertoire 
> `/data/du2_dev/dev/PRODUITS/src/netcdf/Distrib/netcdf-3.6.0/src/f90'
> make[1]: *** [subdir_target] Erreur 1
> make[1]: Quitte le répertoire 
> `/data/du2_dev/dev/PRODUITS/src/netcdf/Distrib/netcdf-3.6.0/src'
> make: *** [f90/test] Erreur 2
> 
> 

-- 
Jacob Weismann Poulsen <jwp@xxxxxx>
Fingerprint: 9315 DC43 D2E4 4F70 3AA8  F8F0 9DA0 B765 F5C8 7D26
>From owner-netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 12 2005 Jan -0700 08:26:34 
Message-ID: <wrx6522d5xx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jan 2005 08:26:34 -0700
From: Ed Hartnett <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <41E5295D.5030301@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Philippe Poilbarbe <philippe.poilbarbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Test problem with F90 and V3.6.0
Received: (from majordo@localhost)
        by unidata.ucar.edu (UCAR/Unidata) id j0CFQg8E027336
        for netcdfgroup-out; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:26:42 -0700 (MST)
Organization: UCAR/Unidata
Keywords: 200501121526.j0CFQZv2027328
Cc: netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <41E5295D.5030301@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Lines: 34
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Ed Hartnett <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Philippe Poilbarbe <philippe.poilbarbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello,
> 
> I have a test problem with F90 and Version 3.6.0.
> 
> At the end of this message there is the output of the test program
> (netcdf_test.f90).
> I have added an another trace output of the 'pressure' variable (print
> *, pressure) to
> make sure that it is normal.
> 
> The environment is:
> uname -a: Linux px-105.ferme 2.6.7-1.492custom #1 SMP Fri Jul 23
> 10:32:17 UTC 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
> Portland group F90 compiler: 5.1.3
> C compiler: gcc 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)
> 
> Did anybody have the same kind of problem ?
> 

This problem is caused by a bug in that version of the Portland F90
compiler.

Portland has a free patch on their site, I believe. Here we just
upgraded to the latest version of the Portland compiler and that fixes
the problem.

Please let me know if this doesn't work for you.

Thanks!

Ed Hartnett
Unidata


  • 2005 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the netcdfgroup archives: